QNTQY
Price
$28.01
Change
+$0.68 (+2.49%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
3.72B
SAABF
Price
$50.91
Change
-$0.09 (-0.18%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
27.65B
Interact to see
Advertisement

QNTQY vs SAABF

Header iconQNTQY vs SAABF Comparison
Open Charts QNTQY vs SAABFBanner chart's image
Qinetiq Group
Price$28.01
Change+$0.68 (+2.49%)
Volume$777
Capitalization3.72B
Saab AB
Price$50.91
Change-$0.09 (-0.18%)
Volume$734
Capitalization27.65B
QNTQY vs SAABF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
QNTQY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SAABF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
QNTQY vs. SAABF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QNTQY is a Hold and SAABF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (QNTQY: $28.01 vs. SAABF: $50.91)
Brand notoriety: QNTQY and SAABF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Aerospace & Defense industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: QNTQY: 17% vs. SAABF: 4%
Market capitalization -- QNTQY: $3.72B vs. SAABF: $27.65B
QNTQY [@Aerospace & Defense] is valued at $3.72B. SAABF’s [@Aerospace & Defense] market capitalization is $27.65B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Aerospace & Defense] industry ranges from $263.27B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Aerospace & Defense] industry is $20.55B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

QNTQY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSAABF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • QNTQY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SAABF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both QNTQY and SAABF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

QNTQY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SAABF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • QNTQY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SAABF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SAABF is a better buy in the short-term than QNTQY.

Price Growth

QNTQY (@Aerospace & Defense) experienced а -1.62% price change this week, while SAABF (@Aerospace & Defense) price change was -2.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Aerospace & Defense industry was -0.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +47.68%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Aerospace & Defense (-0.02% weekly)

Aerospace & Defense is one of largest industries in the U.S., mainly comprising the following areas: commercial airliners, military aircraft, missiles, space, and general aviation. Focused heavily on research & development, it is also one of the fastest growing industries. Military aircraft has the largest market share in the industry’s sales, followed by space systems, civil aircraft, and missiles. Aerospace exports, directly and indirectly, support more jobs than the export of any other commodity, according to a study by the U.S. Department of Commerce. Boeing Company, Lockheed Martin Corporation and General Electric Company are some of the most prominent players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SAABF($27.7B) has a higher market cap than QNTQY($3.72B). SAABF has higher P/E ratio than QNTQY: SAABF (55.71) vs QNTQY (19.05). SAABF YTD gains are higher at: 139.351 vs. QNTQY (36.273). SAABF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.46B vs. QNTQY (26.2M). SAABF has more cash in the bank: 10.2B vs. QNTQY (291M). QNTQY has less debt than SAABF: QNTQY (429M) vs SAABF (10.2B). SAABF has higher revenues than QNTQY: SAABF (65.4B) vs QNTQY (1.93B).
QNTQYSAABFQNTQY / SAABF
Capitalization3.72B27.7B13%
EBITDA26.2M6.46B0%
Gain YTD36.273139.35126%
P/E Ratio19.0555.7134%
Revenue1.93B65.4B3%
Total Cash291M10.2B3%
Total Debt429M10.2B4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
QNTQY vs SAABF: Fundamental Ratings
QNTQY
SAABF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5063
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
21
Undervalued
75
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
282
SMR RATING
1..100
9559
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4436
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6021
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

QNTQY's Valuation (21) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SAABF (75). This means that QNTQY’s stock grew somewhat faster than SAABF’s over the last 12 months.

SAABF's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as QNTQY (28). This means that SAABF’s stock grew similarly to QNTQY’s over the last 12 months.

SAABF's SMR Rating (59) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QNTQY (95). This means that SAABF’s stock grew somewhat faster than QNTQY’s over the last 12 months.

SAABF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as QNTQY (44). This means that SAABF’s stock grew similarly to QNTQY’s over the last 12 months.

SAABF's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QNTQY (60). This means that SAABF’s stock grew somewhat faster than QNTQY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QNTQYSAABF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
40%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
44%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
38%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
43%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
43%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
32%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
QNTQY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SAABF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BBD3.100.06
+2.09%
Banco Bradesco SA
ACIW46.210.72
+1.58%
ACI Worldwide
YIBO1.420.02
+1.43%
Planet Image International Limited
MD13.78N/A
N/A
Pediatrix Medical Group
TLPH0.45N/A
N/A
Talphera

QNTQY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QNTQY has been loosely correlated with XTIA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QNTQY jumps, then XTIA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QNTQY
1D Price
Change %
QNTQY100%
+2.49%
XTIA - QNTQY
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.73%
POWW - QNTQY
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RNMBY - QNTQY
10%
Poorly correlated
-1.76%
SAABF - QNTQY
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.18%
RYCEY - QNTQY
9%
Poorly correlated
+1.40%
More

SAABF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SAABF and RNMBY have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SAABF and RNMBY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SAABF
1D Price
Change %
SAABF100%
-0.18%
RNMBY - SAABF
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.76%
ISSC - SAABF
31%
Poorly correlated
-3.71%
BAESY - SAABF
31%
Poorly correlated
+1.24%
EADSY - SAABF
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.35%
SAABY - SAABF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More