Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QNTIX vs RGWBX
QNTIX vs RGWBX Comparison
Open Charts QNTIX vs RGWBX
Meeder Sector Rotation Institutional
Price$38.71
Change-$1.73 (-4.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.14M
American Funds Growth Portfolio R2
Price$27.85
Change-$0.82 (-2.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.13B
QNTIX vs RGWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QNTIX vs. RGWBX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QNTIX is a Hold and RGWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGWBX has more cash in the bank: 25.1B vs. QNTIX (42.1M). QNTIX pays higher dividends than RGWBX: QNTIX (0.80) vs RGWBX (0.00). QNTIX was incepted earlier than RGWBX: QNTIX (9 years) vs RGWBX (14 years). QNTIX (1.58) is less costly to investors than RGWBX (1.46). RGWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than QNTIX: RGWBX (250) vs QNTIX (1000000). QNTIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.34 vs. RGWBX (10.69). RGWBX return over 5 years is better than : 17.86 vs. QNTIX (9.94).
| QNTIX | RGWBX | QNTIX / RGWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.58 | 1.46 | 108% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.58 | 1.46 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.307 | 1.052 | 219% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.1M | 25.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.80 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.34 | 10.69 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.77 | 48.42 | 18% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.94 | 17.86 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 114.42 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement