Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QNTAX vs RGWBX
QNTAX vs RGWBX Comparison
Open Charts QNTAX vs RGWBX
Meeder Sector Rotation Adviser
Price$40.60
Change-$0.68 (-1.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41M
American Funds Growth Portfolio R2
Price$28.37
Change-$0.57 (-1.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.95B
QNTAX vs RGWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QNTAX vs. RGWBX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QNTAX is a Buy and RGWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGWBX has more cash in the bank: 24.9B vs. QNTAX (41M). QNTAX pays higher dividends than RGWBX: QNTAX (0.74) vs RGWBX (0.00). QNTAX was incepted earlier than RGWBX: QNTAX (9 years) vs RGWBX (14 years). QNTAX (1.55) is less costly to investors than RGWBX (1.46). RGWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than QNTAX: RGWBX (250) vs QNTAX (2500). RGWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.54 vs. QNTAX (-1.02). RGWBX return over 5 years is better than : 34.10 vs. QNTAX (32.42).
| QNTAX | RGWBX | QNTAX / RGWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.55 | 1.46 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.55 | 1.46 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.427 | 18.899 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41M | 24.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.74 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.02 | 10.54 | -10% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.54 | 48.84 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.42 | 34.10 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 94.79 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement