Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QNTAX vs RGWBX
QNTAX vs RGWBX Comparison
Open Charts QNTAX vs RGWBX
Meeder Sector Rotation Adviser
Price$40.21
Change+$0.13 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.58M
American Funds Growth Portfolio R2
Price$28.37
Change+$0.02 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.42B
QNTAX vs RGWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QNTAX vs. RGWBX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QNTAX is a Hold and RGWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGWBX has more cash in the bank: 24.4B vs. QNTAX (40.6M). QNTAX pays higher dividends than RGWBX: QNTAX (0.75) vs RGWBX (0.00). QNTAX was incepted earlier than RGWBX: QNTAX (9 years) vs RGWBX (13 years). QNTAX (1.55) is less costly to investors than RGWBX (1.46). RGWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than QNTAX: RGWBX (250) vs QNTAX (2500). RGWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.35 vs. QNTAX (-2.35). QNTAX (35.85) and RGWBX (34.64) have equivalent 5 years return.
| QNTAX | RGWBX | QNTAX / RGWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.55 | 1.46 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.55 | 1.46 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.331 | 16.557 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.6M | 24.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.35 | 10.35 | -23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.61 | 56.88 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.85 | 34.64 | 104% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 89.93 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement