Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QNTAX vs RGSFX
QNTAX vs RGSFX Comparison
Open Charts QNTAX vs RGSFX
Meeder Sector Rotation Adviser
Price$40.02
Change+$0.21 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.65M
American Funds Growth Portfolio R5E
Price$29.48
Change+$0.10 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.12B
QNTAX vs RGSFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QNTAX vs. RGSFX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QNTAX is a Hold and RGSFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGSFX has more cash in the bank: 24.1B vs. QNTAX (40.7M). QNTAX pays higher dividends than RGSFX: QNTAX (0.91) vs RGSFX (0.57). QNTAX was incepted earlier than RGSFX: QNTAX (9 years) vs RGSFX (10 years). QNTAX (1.55) is less costly to investors than RGSFX (0.52). RGSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than QNTAX: RGSFX (250) vs QNTAX (2500). RGSFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.61 vs. QNTAX (-2.96). QNTAX (47.72) and RGSFX (47.42) have equivalent 5 years return.
| QNTAX | RGSFX | QNTAX / RGSFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.55 | 0.52 | 298% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.55 | 0.52 | 298% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.550 | 16.384 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.7M | 24.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.91 | 0.57 | 159% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.96 | 11.61 | -26% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.39 | 63.02 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.72 | 47.42 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers