Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QMID vs VOT
QMID vs VOT Comparison
Open Charts QMID vs VOT
WisdomTree U.S. Mid Cap Quality Gr
Price$29.04
Change+$0.24 (+0.83%)
Volume$300
Net Assets1.44M
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Price$285.41
Change+$0.66 (+0.23%)
Volume$283
Net Assets33.11B
QMID vs VOT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QMID vs. VOT commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QMID is a Buy and VOT is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VOT has more net assets: 33.1B vs. QMID (1.44M). VOT has a higher annual dividend yield than QMID: VOT (12.312) vs QMID (6.546). QMID was incepted earlier than VOT: QMID (2 years) vs VOT (19 years). VOT (0.07) has a lower expense ratio than QMID (0.38). QMID has a higher turnover VOT (21.00) vs VOT (21.00).
| QMID | VOT | QMID / VOT | |
| Gain YTD | 6.546 | 12.312 | 53% |
| Net Assets | 1.44M | 33.1B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.38 | 0.07 | 543% |
| Turnover | 50.00 | 21.00 | 238% |
| Yield | 1.09 | 0.64 | 171% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 19 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| QMID | VOT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 56% | 17 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
QMID and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QMID has been loosely correlated with CSW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QMID jumps, then CSW could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QMID | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QMID | 100% | +1.15% | ||
| CSW - QMID | 41% Loosely correlated | +9.01% | ||
| SEIC - QMID | 35% Loosely correlated | +1.30% | ||
| CR - QMID | 32% Poorly correlated | +1.47% | ||
| DBX - QMID | 32% Poorly correlated | +0.77% | ||
| LECO - QMID | 32% Poorly correlated | +1.48% | ||
More | ||||
VOT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VOT has been closely correlated with TRMB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VOT jumps, then TRMB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VOT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VOT | 100% | +0.88% | ||
| TRMB - VOT | 84% Closely correlated | +0.13% | ||
| ARES - VOT | 80% Closely correlated | +1.33% | ||
| APO - VOT | 78% Closely correlated | +1.83% | ||
| CCL - VOT | 76% Closely correlated | +0.77% | ||
| OWL - VOT | 75% Closely correlated | +5.03% | ||
More | ||||