Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QMID vs VOT
QMID vs VOT Comparison
Open Charts QMID vs VOT
WisdomTree U.S. Mid Cap Quality Gr
Price$26.80
Change-$0.09 (-0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.34M
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Price$284.50
Change+$2.16 (+0.77%)
Volume$593
Net Assets29.66B
QMID vs VOT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QMID vs. VOT commentary
Jul 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QMID is a Buy and VOT is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VOT has more net assets: 29.7B vs. QMID (1.34M). VOT has a higher annual dividend yield than QMID: VOT (11.298) vs QMID (-2.994). QMID was incepted earlier than VOT: QMID (1 year) vs VOT (19 years). VOT (0.07) has a lower expense ratio than QMID (0.38). VOT has a higher turnover QMID (0.00) vs QMID (0.00).
| QMID | VOT | QMID / VOT | |
| Gain YTD | -2.994 | 11.298 | -27% |
| Net Assets | 1.34M | 29.7B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.38 | 0.07 | 543% |
| Turnover | 0.00 | 21.00 | - |
| Yield | 1.21 | 0.65 | 187% |
| Fund Existence | 1 year | 19 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| QMID | VOT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 64% | 4 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 67% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
QMID and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QMID has been loosely correlated with BCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QMID jumps, then BCC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QMID | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QMID | 100% | N/A | ||
| BCC - QMID | 52% Loosely correlated | +1.02% | ||
| EXP - QMID | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.88% | ||
| AIT - QMID | 51% Loosely correlated | -0.22% | ||
| SEIC - QMID | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.34% | ||
| UFPI - QMID | 48% Loosely correlated | -0.10% | ||
More | ||||
VOT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VOT has been closely correlated with APO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VOT jumps, then APO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VOT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VOT | 100% | +0.86% | ||
| APO - VOT | 81% Closely correlated | +2.56% | ||
| ARES - VOT | 80% Closely correlated | +1.21% | ||
| OWL - VOT | 78% Closely correlated | +1.35% | ||
| TRMB - VOT | 78% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| IR - VOT | 76% Closely correlated | -0.79% | ||
More | ||||