Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QMID vs VOT
QMID vs VOT Comparison
Open Charts QMID vs VOT
WisdomTree U.S. Mid Cap Quality Gr
Price$27.34
Change+$1.12 (+4.27%)
Volume$768
Net Assets1.37M
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Price$287.60
Change+$0.26 (+0.09%)
Volume$1.35K
Net Assets31.45B
QMID vs VOT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QMID vs. VOT commentary
Jul 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QMID is a Buy and VOT is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VOT has more net assets: 31.5B vs. QMID (1.37M). VOT has a higher annual dividend yield than QMID: VOT (13.301) vs QMID (1.131). QMID was incepted earlier than VOT: QMID (1 year) vs VOT (19 years). VOT (0.07) has a lower expense ratio than QMID (0.38). QMID has a higher turnover VOT (21.00) vs VOT (21.00).
| QMID | VOT | QMID / VOT | |
| Gain YTD | 1.131 | 13.301 | 9% |
| Net Assets | 1.37M | 31.5B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.38 | 0.07 | 543% |
| Turnover | 50.00 | 21.00 | 238% |
| Yield | 1.17 | 0.63 | 186% |
| Fund Existence | 1 year | 19 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| QMID | VOT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 6 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 12 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
QMID and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QMID has been loosely correlated with AIT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QMID jumps, then AIT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QMID | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QMID | 100% | N/A | ||
| AIT - QMID | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.19% | ||
| BCC - QMID | 48% Loosely correlated | -0.45% | ||
| EXP - QMID | 48% Loosely correlated | -1.19% | ||
| SEIC - QMID | 47% Loosely correlated | -2.48% | ||
| LECO - QMID | 45% Loosely correlated | -1.69% | ||
More | ||||
VOT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VOT has been closely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VOT jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VOT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VOT | 100% | -0.56% | ||
| ARES - VOT | 80% Closely correlated | -2.31% | ||
| APO - VOT | 79% Closely correlated | -2.18% | ||
| OWL - VOT | 77% Closely correlated | -2.86% | ||
| TRMB - VOT | 77% Closely correlated | -0.74% | ||
| HLT - VOT | 75% Closely correlated | -0.67% | ||
More | ||||