Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QMGCX vs VFWPX
QMGCX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts QMGCX vs VFWPX
Invesco Advantage International C
Price$12.72
Change+$0.02 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets56.38M
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$150.52
Change+$0.01 (+0.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.16B
QMGCX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QMGCX vs. VFWPX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QMGCX is a Hold and VFWPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 74.2B vs. QMGCX (56.4M). QMGCX pays higher dividends than VFWPX: QMGCX (3.14) vs VFWPX (2.74). QMGCX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: QMGCX (10 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). QMGCX (2.71) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). QMGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 156.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). QMGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: QMGCX (1000) vs VFWPX (100000000). QMGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.26 vs. VFWPX (18.07). VFWPX return over 5 years is better than : 45.32 vs. QMGCX (26.47).
| QMGCX | VFWPX | QMGCX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 0.03 | 6,433% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.71 | 0.03 | 9,033% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 26.693 | 26.221 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 56.4M | 74.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.14 | 2.74 | 115% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.26 | 18.07 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.68 | 63.09 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.47 | 45.32 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.27 | 70.07 | 63% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement