Intraday BUY SELL Signals
46 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QLVE vs YUMC
QLVE vs YUMC Comparison
Open Charts QLVE vs YUMC
FlexShares EMs Quality Lw Vol ETF
Price$29.12
Change+$0.09 (+0.31%)
Volume$1.96K
Net Assets14.69M
Yum China Holdings
Price$49.03
Change+$0.52 (+1.07%)
Volume$676.14K
Capitalization17.38B
QLVE vs YUMC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QLVE vs. YUMC commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QLVE is a Hold and YUMC is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
YUMC: Fundamental Ratings
YUMC | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 14 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 37 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 53 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| QLVE | YUMC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 68% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 65% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 61% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 64% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago 59% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 70% | 19 days ago 67% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 60% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
QLVE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that QLVE and ZTO have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QLVE and ZTO's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QLVE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QLVE | 100% | N/A | ||
| ZTO - QLVE | 5% Poorly correlated | -0.84% | ||
| JD - QLVE | 5% Poorly correlated | +0.31% | ||
| YUMC - QLVE | 4% Poorly correlated | +1.07% | ||
| BAP - QLVE | 2% Poorly correlated | +0.16% | ||
| VOD - QLVE | 2% Poorly correlated | +0.31% | ||
More | ||||
YUMC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, YUMC has been loosely correlated with YUM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if YUMC jumps, then YUM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To YUMC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YUMC | 100% | +1.07% | ||
| YUM - YUMC | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.14% | ||
| DPZ - YUMC | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.18% | ||
| FRSH - YUMC | 30% Poorly correlated | -0.16% | ||
| SBUX - YUMC | 30% Poorly correlated | +0.85% | ||
| TXRH - YUMC | 29% Poorly correlated | +2.17% | ||
More | ||||