Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QLSGX vs WCMLX
QLSGX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts QLSGX vs WCMLX
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Growth R6
Price$33.15
Change+$0.53 (+1.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets655.84M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$14.64
Change+$0.83 (+6.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.08M
QLSGX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QLSGX vs. WCMLX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QLSGX is a StrongBuy and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QLSGX has more cash in the bank: 656M vs. WCMLX (47.1M). QLSGX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . QLSGX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: QLSGX (10 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than QLSGX (1.02). QLSGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 91.00 vs. WCMLX (83.00). QLSGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: QLSGX (0) vs WCMLX (100000). QLSGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.23 vs. WCMLX (8.52). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -5.30 vs. QLSGX (-6.93).
| QLSGX | WCMLX | QLSGX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.99 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.79 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.442 | 6.395 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 656M | 47.1M | 1,393% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.23 | 8.52 | 190% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.37 | 19.51 | 207% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.93 | -5.30 | 131% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement