Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QLSGX vs WCMLX
QLSGX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts QLSGX vs WCMLX
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Growth R6
Price$32.52
Change+$0.07 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets606.1M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$14.08
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.65M
QLSGX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QLSGX vs. WCMLX commentary
Dec 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QLSGX is a StrongBuy and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QLSGX has more cash in the bank: 606M vs. WCMLX (44.7M). QLSGX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . QLSGX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: QLSGX (9 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than QLSGX (1.02). QLSGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 91.00 vs. WCMLX (83.00). QLSGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: QLSGX (0) vs WCMLX (100000). QLSGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.63 vs. WCMLX (8.14). QLSGX return over 5 years is better than : -2.19 vs. WCMLX (-4.02).
| QLSGX | WCMLX | QLSGX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.99 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.79 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.606 | 9.487 | 165% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 606M | 44.7M | 1,356% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.63 | 8.14 | 167% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.87 | 33.08 | 184% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.19 | -4.02 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement