Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QLSCX vs VSMAX
QLSCX vs VSMAX Comparison
Open Charts QLSCX vs VSMAX
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core R6
Price$30.08
Change+$0.28 (+0.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.5B
Vanguard Small Cap Index Admiral Shares
Price$122.14
Change+$1.18 (+0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets161.26B
QLSCX vs VSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QLSCX vs. VSMAX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QLSCX is a Buy and VSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VSMAX has more cash in the bank: 161B vs. QLSCX (1.5B). VSMAX pays higher dividends than QLSCX: VSMAX (1.31) vs QLSCX (0.33). QLSCX was incepted earlier than VSMAX: QLSCX (9 years) vs VSMAX (25 years). QLSCX (0.88) is less costly to investors than VSMAX (0.05). QLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. VSMAX (13.00). QLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VSMAX: QLSCX (0) vs VSMAX (3000). QLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.04 vs. VSMAX (8.03). QLSCX return over 5 years is better than : 76.35 vs. VSMAX (71.73).
| QLSCX | VSMAX | QLSCX / VSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.05 | 1,760% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.05 | 1,760% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.155 | 6.240 | 195% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.5B | 161B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.33 | 1.31 | 25% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.04 | 8.03 | 175% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.51 | 50.82 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 76.35 | 71.73 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 148.94 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement