Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QLSCX vs VSCPX
QLSCX vs VSCPX Comparison
Open Charts QLSCX vs VSCPX
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core R6
Price$29.34
Change-$0.82 (-2.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.46B
Vanguard Small Cap Index InstlPlus
Price$346.17
Change-$7.85 (-2.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets161.58B
QLSCX vs VSCPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QLSCX vs. VSCPX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QLSCX is a Buy and VSCPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VSCPX has more cash in the bank: 162B vs. QLSCX (1.46B). VSCPX pays higher dividends than QLSCX: VSCPX (1.36) vs QLSCX (0.32). QLSCX was incepted earlier than VSCPX: QLSCX (9 years) vs VSCPX (15 years). QLSCX (0.89) is less costly to investors than VSCPX (0.03). QLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. VSCPX (13.00). QLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VSCPX: QLSCX (0) vs VSCPX (100000000). QLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.05 vs. VSCPX (-0.31). QLSCX return over 5 years is better than : 50.45 vs. VSCPX (45.15).
| QLSCX | VSCPX | QLSCX / VSCPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.03 | 2,933% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.03 | 2,967% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.453 | 4.403 | 283% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.46B | 162B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 1.36 | 23% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.05 | -0.31 | -1,984% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.90 | 32.00 | 134% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.45 | 45.15 | 112% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 130.76 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement