Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QLSCX vs VSCPX
QLSCX vs VSCPX Comparison
Open Charts QLSCX vs VSCPX
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core R6
Price$30.08
Change+$0.28 (+0.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.5B
Vanguard Small Cap Index InstlPlus
Price$352.54
Change+$3.39 (+0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets161.26B
QLSCX vs VSCPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QLSCX vs. VSCPX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QLSCX is a Buy and VSCPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VSCPX has more cash in the bank: 161B vs. QLSCX (1.5B). VSCPX pays higher dividends than QLSCX: VSCPX (1.33) vs QLSCX (0.33). QLSCX was incepted earlier than VSCPX: QLSCX (9 years) vs VSCPX (15 years). QLSCX (0.88) is less costly to investors than VSCPX (0.03). QLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. VSCPX (13.00). QLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VSCPX: QLSCX (0) vs VSCPX (100000000). QLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.04 vs. VSCPX (8.04). QLSCX return over 5 years is better than : 76.35 vs. VSCPX (71.78).
| QLSCX | VSCPX | QLSCX / VSCPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.03 | 2,933% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.03 | 2,933% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.155 | 6.250 | 194% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.5B | 161B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.33 | 1.33 | 24% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.04 | 8.04 | 175% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.51 | 50.86 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 76.35 | 71.78 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 149.06 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement