Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QLSCX vs VSCPX
QLSCX vs VSCPX Comparison
Open Charts QLSCX vs VSCPX
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core R6
Price$29.11
Change+$0.09 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.57B
Vanguard Small Cap Index InstlPlus
Price$364.26
Change+$0.82 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets163.34B
QLSCX vs VSCPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QLSCX vs. VSCPX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QLSCX is a Buy and VSCPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VSCPX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. QLSCX (1.57B). VSCPX pays higher dividends than QLSCX: VSCPX (1.34) vs QLSCX (0.31). QLSCX was incepted earlier than VSCPX: QLSCX (9 years) vs VSCPX (15 years). QLSCX (0.89) is less costly to investors than VSCPX (0.03). QLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.00 vs. VSCPX (13.00). QLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VSCPX: QLSCX (0) vs VSCPX (100000000). VSCPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.24 vs. QLSCX (7.21). VSCPX return over 5 years is better than : 36.53 vs. QLSCX (24.30).
| QLSCX | VSCPX | QLSCX / VSCPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.03 | 2,933% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.03 | 2,967% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.538 | 9.859 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.57B | 163B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.31 | 1.34 | 23% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.21 | 8.24 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.04 | 44.97 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.30 | 36.53 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 144.00 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement