Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QLSCX vs VSCPX
QLSCX vs VSCPX Comparison
Open Charts QLSCX vs VSCPX
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core R6
Price$25.57
Change-$0.44 (-1.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.34B
Vanguard Small Cap Index InstlPlus
Price$317.59
Change-$5.19 (-1.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets147.56B
QLSCX vs VSCPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QLSCX vs. VSCPX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QLSCX is a Hold and VSCPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VSCPX has more cash in the bank: 148B vs. QLSCX (1.34B). VSCPX pays higher dividends than QLSCX: VSCPX (1.50) vs QLSCX (0.38). QLSCX was incepted earlier than VSCPX: QLSCX (9 years) vs VSCPX (15 years). QLSCX (0.88) is less costly to investors than VSCPX (0.03). QLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. VSCPX (13.00). QLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VSCPX: QLSCX (0) vs VSCPX (100000000). QLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.23 vs. VSCPX (5.23). VSCPX return over 5 years is better than : 63.41 vs. QLSCX (55.83).
| QLSCX | VSCPX | QLSCX / VSCPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.03 | 2,933% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.03 | 2,933% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.661 | -4.355 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.34B | 148B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.38 | 1.50 | 26% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.23 | 5.23 | 157% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.83 | 31.39 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.83 | 63.41 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 93.45 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement