Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QLSCX vs VSCPX
QLSCX vs VSCPX Comparison
Open Charts QLSCX vs VSCPX
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core R6
Price$27.55
Change+$0.11 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.48B
Vanguard Small Cap Index InstlPlus
Price$341.12
Change+$2.08 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets153.28B
QLSCX vs VSCPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QLSCX vs. VSCPX commentary
Jul 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QLSCX is a Buy and VSCPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VSCPX has more cash in the bank: 153B vs. QLSCX (1.48B). VSCPX pays higher dividends than QLSCX: VSCPX (1.42) vs QLSCX (0.36). QLSCX was incepted earlier than VSCPX: QLSCX (9 years) vs VSCPX (15 years). QLSCX (0.88) is less costly to investors than VSCPX (0.03). QLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. VSCPX (13.00). QLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VSCPX: QLSCX (0) vs VSCPX (100000000). VSCPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.49 vs. QLSCX (7.50). VSCPX return over 5 years is better than : 66.90 vs. QLSCX (60.31).
| QLSCX | VSCPX | QLSCX / VSCPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.03 | 2,933% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.03 | 2,933% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.722 | 2.808 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.48B | 153B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.36 | 1.42 | 26% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.50 | 8.49 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.12 | 34.28 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.31 | 66.90 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 115.31 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement