Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QLSCX vs VSCPX
QLSCX vs VSCPX Comparison
Open Charts QLSCX vs VSCPX
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core R6
Price$29.96
Change-$0.11 (-0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.65B
Vanguard Small Cap Index InstlPlus
Price$376.44
Change+$22.71 (+6.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.31B
QLSCX vs VSCPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QLSCX vs. VSCPX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QLSCX is a Hold and VSCPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VSCPX has more cash in the bank: 162B vs. QLSCX (1.65B). VSCPX pays higher dividends than QLSCX: VSCPX (1.29) vs QLSCX (0.31). QLSCX was incepted earlier than VSCPX: QLSCX (10 years) vs VSCPX (15 years). QLSCX (0.89) is less costly to investors than VSCPX (0.03). QLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.00 vs. VSCPX (13.00). QLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VSCPX: QLSCX (0) vs VSCPX (100000000). VSCPX (10.72) and QLSCX (10.36) have marching annual gain over last year. VSCPX return over 5 years is better than : 31.96 vs. QLSCX (20.14).
| QLSCX | VSCPX | QLSCX / VSCPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.03 | 2,933% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.03 | 2,967% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.456 | 5.537 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.65B | 162B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.31 | 1.29 | 24% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.36 | 10.72 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.35 | 33.13 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.14 | 31.96 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 186.98 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement