Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QLSCX vs VRTIX
QLSCX vs VRTIX Comparison
Open Charts QLSCX vs VRTIX
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core R6
Price$29.91
Change+$0.18 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.63B
Vanguard Russell 2000 Index I
Price$406.87
Change+$2.85 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.31B
QLSCX vs VRTIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QLSCX vs. VRTIX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QLSCX is a Hold and VRTIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VRTIX has more cash in the bank: 14.3B vs. QLSCX (1.63B). VRTIX pays higher dividends than QLSCX: VRTIX (1.25) vs QLSCX (0.32). QLSCX was incepted earlier than VRTIX: QLSCX (10 years) vs VRTIX (15 years). QLSCX (0.89) is less costly to investors than VRTIX (0.07). QLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.00 vs. VRTIX (14.00). QLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VRTIX: QLSCX (0) vs VRTIX (5000000). VRTIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.93 vs. QLSCX (12.20). VRTIX return over 5 years is better than : 27.09 vs. QLSCX (20.56).
| QLSCX | VRTIX | QLSCX / VRTIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.07 | 1,257% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.07 | 1,271% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.280 | 6.855 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.63B | 14.3B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 1.25 | 26% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.20 | 19.93 | 61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.47 | 42.44 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.56 | 27.09 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 175.04 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement