Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QLSCX vs VRTIX
QLSCX vs VRTIX Comparison
Open Charts QLSCX vs VRTIX
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core R6
Price$29.11
Change+$0.09 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.57B
Vanguard Russell 2000 Index I
Price$390.71
Change+$1.07 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.25B
QLSCX vs VRTIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QLSCX vs. VRTIX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QLSCX is a Buy and VRTIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VRTIX has more cash in the bank: 14.3B vs. QLSCX (1.57B). VRTIX pays higher dividends than QLSCX: VRTIX (1.17) vs QLSCX (0.31). QLSCX was incepted earlier than VRTIX: QLSCX (9 years) vs VRTIX (15 years). QLSCX (0.89) is less costly to investors than VRTIX (0.07). QLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.00 vs. VRTIX (14.00). QLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VRTIX: QLSCX (0) vs VRTIX (5000000). VRTIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.07 vs. QLSCX (7.21). VRTIX return over 5 years is better than : 29.26 vs. QLSCX (24.30).
| QLSCX | VRTIX | QLSCX / VRTIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.07 | 1,257% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.07 | 1,271% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.538 | 14.503 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.57B | 14.3B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.31 | 1.17 | 27% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.21 | 13.07 | 55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.04 | 46.54 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.30 | 29.26 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 130.53 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement