Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QLSCX vs VRTIX
QLSCX vs VRTIX Comparison
Open Charts QLSCX vs VRTIX
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core R6
Price$29.34
Change-$0.82 (-2.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.46B
Vanguard Russell 2000 Index I
Price$366.15
Change-$10.42 (-2.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.89B
QLSCX vs VRTIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QLSCX vs. VRTIX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QLSCX is a Buy and VRTIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VRTIX has more cash in the bank: 13.9B vs. QLSCX (1.46B). VRTIX pays higher dividends than QLSCX: VRTIX (1.18) vs QLSCX (0.32). QLSCX was incepted earlier than VRTIX: QLSCX (9 years) vs VRTIX (15 years). QLSCX (0.89) is less costly to investors than VRTIX (0.07). QLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. VRTIX (12.00). QLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VRTIX: QLSCX (0) vs VRTIX (5000000). QLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.05 vs. VRTIX (2.86). QLSCX return over 5 years is better than : 50.45 vs. VRTIX (42.91).
| QLSCX | VRTIX | QLSCX / VRTIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.07 | 1,257% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.07 | 1,271% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.453 | 10.359 | 120% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.46B | 13.9B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 1.18 | 27% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.05 | 2.86 | 212% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.90 | 31.84 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.45 | 42.91 | 118% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 123.36 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement