Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QLENX vs RLSFX
QLENX vs RLSFX Comparison
Open Charts QLENX vs RLSFX
RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Retail
Price$14.87
Change+$0.02 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.33M
QLENX vs RLSFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QLENX vs. RLSFX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QLENX is a Hold and RLSFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QLENX has more cash in the bank: 5.79B vs. RLSFX (36.3M). QLENX pays higher dividends than RLSFX: QLENX (5.94) vs RLSFX (0.00). QLENX was incepted earlier than RLSFX: QLENX (12 years) vs RLSFX (13 years). QLENX (5.59) is less costly to investors than RLSFX (2.17). QLENX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 362.00 vs. RLSFX (10.00). RLSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than QLENX: RLSFX (1000) vs QLENX (2500). QLENX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.34 vs. RLSFX (14.73). QLENX return over 5 years is better than : 185.71 vs. RLSFX (-5.61).
| QLENX | RLSFX | QLENX / RLSFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 5.58 | 2.00 | 279% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 5.59 | 2.17 | 258% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.590 | 6.017 | 342% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.79B | 36.3M | 15,950% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.94 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.34 | 14.73 | 199% |
| Returns for 3 years | 107.97 | 65.55 | 165% |
| Returns for 5 years | 185.71 | -5.61 | -3,309% |
| Returns for 10 years | 157.42 | 44.40 | 355% |