Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QLD vs WEBL
QLD vs WEBL Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QLD vs. WEBL commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QLD is a Hold and WEBL is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QLD has more net assets: 7.92B vs. WEBL (150M). QLD has a higher annual dividend yield than WEBL: QLD (-0.556) vs WEBL (-4.786). QLD was incepted earlier than WEBL: QLD (19 years) vs WEBL (6 years). QLD (0.95) and WEBL (0.98) have comparable expense ratios . WEBL has a higher turnover QLD (24.00) vs QLD (24.00).
| QLD | WEBL | QLD / WEBL | |
| Gain YTD | -0.556 | -4.786 | 12% |
| Net Assets | 7.92B | 150M | 5,278% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.98 | 97% |
| Turnover | 24.00 | 61.00 | 39% |
| Yield | 0.23 | 0.10 | 234% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| QLD | WEBL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 27 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
QLD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QLD has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QLD jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QLD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QLD | 100% | -2.56% | ||
| LRCX - QLD | 81% Closely correlated | -2.33% | ||
| META - QLD | 78% Closely correlated | -1.51% | ||
| CDNS - QLD | 76% Closely correlated | -2.55% | ||
| ARM - QLD | 76% Closely correlated | -2.21% | ||
| MSFT - QLD | 75% Closely correlated | -0.82% | ||
More | ||||
WEBL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WEBL has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WEBL jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WEBL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WEBL | 100% | -4.67% | ||
| AMZN - WEBL | 74% Closely correlated | -0.53% | ||
| DDOG - WEBL | 72% Closely correlated | -1.82% | ||
| HUBS - WEBL | 70% Closely correlated | -2.67% | ||
| NET - WEBL | 69% Closely correlated | +0.68% | ||
| ANET - WEBL | 68% Closely correlated | -3.57% | ||
More | ||||