Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QLD vs WEBL
QLD vs WEBL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QLD vs. WEBL commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QLD is a Buy and WEBL is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QLD has more net assets: 11.1B vs. WEBL (122M). QLD has a higher annual dividend yield than WEBL: QLD (34.610) vs WEBL (5.702). QLD was incepted earlier than WEBL: QLD (20 years) vs WEBL (6 years). QLD (0.95) and WEBL (0.98) have comparable expense ratios . WEBL has a higher turnover QLD (16.00) vs QLD (16.00).
| QLD | WEBL | QLD / WEBL | |
| Gain YTD | 34.610 | 5.702 | 607% |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 122M | 9,098% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.98 | 97% |
| Turnover | 16.00 | 61.00 | 26% |
| Yield | 0.18 | 0.25 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| QLD | WEBL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 85% | 12 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
QLD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QLD has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QLD jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QLD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QLD | 100% | +0.51% | ||
| LRCX - QLD | 79% Closely correlated | +1.24% | ||
| AMZN - QLD | 79% Closely correlated | +0.10% | ||
| NVDA - QLD | 78% Closely correlated | -0.32% | ||
| KLAC - QLD | 77% Closely correlated | +0.65% | ||
| MSFT - QLD | 75% Closely correlated | +0.24% | ||
More | ||||
WEBL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WEBL has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WEBL jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WEBL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WEBL | 100% | +0.25% | ||
| AMZN - WEBL | 82% Closely correlated | +0.10% | ||
| META - WEBL | 80% Closely correlated | +0.39% | ||
| NET - WEBL | 76% Closely correlated | +0.29% | ||
| HUBS - WEBL | 73% Closely correlated | +0.15% | ||
| CRM - WEBL | 70% Closely correlated | +0.69% | ||
More | ||||