Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QLD vs UWM
QLD vs UWM Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QLD vs. UWM commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QLD is a Hold and UWM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QLD has more net assets: 7.92B vs. UWM (317M). QLD has a higher annual dividend yield than UWM: QLD (-0.556) vs UWM (-15.508). QLD was incepted earlier than UWM: QLD (19 years) vs UWM (18 years). QLD (0.95) and UWM (0.95) have comparable expense ratios . UWM has a higher turnover QLD (24.00) vs QLD (24.00).
| QLD | UWM | QLD / UWM | |
| Gain YTD | -0.556 | -15.508 | 4% |
| Net Assets | 7.92B | 317M | 2,497% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.95 | 100% |
| Turnover | 24.00 | 40.00 | 60% |
| Yield | 0.23 | 1.48 | 16% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 18 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| QLD | UWM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 26 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BRTR | 49.82 | -0.11 | -0.22% |
| iShares Total Return Active ETF | |||
| QDEC | 28.41 | -0.17 | -0.59% |
| FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF – Dec | |||
| EBIZ | 29.85 | -0.80 | -2.63% |
| Global X E-commerce ETF | |||
| NVDG | 12.30 | -0.52 | -4.06% |
| Leverage Shares 2X Long Nvda Daily ETF | |||
| TNA | 30.53 | -1.77 | -5.48% |
| Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X ETF | |||
QLD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QLD has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QLD jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QLD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QLD | 100% | -2.56% | ||
| LRCX - QLD | 81% Closely correlated | -2.33% | ||
| META - QLD | 78% Closely correlated | -1.51% | ||
| CDNS - QLD | 76% Closely correlated | -2.55% | ||
| ARM - QLD | 76% Closely correlated | -2.21% | ||
| MSFT - QLD | 75% Closely correlated | -0.82% | ||
More | ||||
UWM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UWM has been loosely correlated with FIX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UWM jumps, then FIX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UWM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UWM | 100% | -3.71% | ||
| FIX - UWM | 46% Loosely correlated | -1.70% | ||
| ONTO - UWM | 41% Loosely correlated | -5.30% | ||
| SMCI - UWM | 30% Poorly correlated | -4.15% | ||
| ELF - UWM | 29% Poorly correlated | -2.55% | ||
| MSTR - UWM | 29% Poorly correlated | +0.82% |