Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QLD vs UWM
QLD vs UWM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QLD vs. UWM commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QLD is a Buy and UWM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QLD has more net assets: 9.04B vs. UWM (352M). QLD has a higher annual dividend yield than UWM: QLD (14.207) vs UWM (-3.031). QLD was incepted earlier than UWM: QLD (19 years) vs UWM (19 years). QLD (0.95) and UWM (0.95) have comparable expense ratios . UWM has a higher turnover QLD (24.00) vs QLD (24.00).
| QLD | UWM | QLD / UWM | |
| Gain YTD | 14.207 | -3.031 | -469% |
| Net Assets | 9.04B | 352M | 2,568% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.95 | 100% |
| Turnover | 24.00 | 40.00 | 60% |
| Yield | 0.22 | 1.10 | 20% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 19 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| QLD | UWM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 86% | 7 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
QLD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QLD has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QLD jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QLD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QLD | 100% | +0.40% | ||
| LRCX - QLD | 80% Closely correlated | -0.84% | ||
| META - QLD | 79% Closely correlated | -0.30% | ||
| ARM - QLD | 77% Closely correlated | +1.99% | ||
| CDNS - QLD | 76% Closely correlated | +2.33% | ||
| MSFT - QLD | 75% Closely correlated | +0.55% | ||
More | ||||
UWM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UWM has been loosely correlated with FIX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UWM jumps, then FIX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UWM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UWM | 100% | +0.65% | ||
| FIX - UWM | 46% Loosely correlated | +22.37% | ||
| ONTO - UWM | 41% Loosely correlated | +1.21% | ||
| SMCI - UWM | 30% Poorly correlated | +3.71% | ||
| ELF - UWM | 29% Poorly correlated | +1.38% | ||
| MSTR - UWM | 29% Poorly correlated | -2.18% |