Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QLC vs SPY
QLC vs SPY Comparison
Open Charts QLC vs SPY
FlexShares US Quality Large Cap ETF
Price$77.62
Change+$0.53 (+0.69%)
Volume$27.47K
Net Assets630.39M
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
Price$661.82
Change+$3.77 (+0.57%)
Volume$69.18M
Net Assets668.48B
QLC vs SPY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QLC vs. SPY commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QLC is a Hold and SPY is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SPY has more net assets: 668B vs. QLC (630M). QLC has a higher annual dividend yield than SPY: QLC (17.716) vs SPY (13.913). QLC was incepted earlier than SPY: QLC (10 years) vs SPY (33 years). SPY (0.09) has a lower expense ratio than QLC (0.25). QLC has a higher turnover SPY (3.00) vs SPY (3.00).
| QLC | SPY | QLC / SPY | |
| Gain YTD | 17.716 | 13.913 | 127% |
| Net Assets | 630M | 668B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 0.09 | 265% |
| Turnover | 16.00 | 3.00 | 533% |
| Yield | 0.90 | 1.11 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 33 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| QLC | SPY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 86% | 6 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
QLC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QLC has been closely correlated with GS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QLC jumps, then GS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
SPY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPY has been loosely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SPY jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SPY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPY | 100% | +0.57% | ||
| MSFT - SPY | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.87% | ||
| AAPL - SPY | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.55% | ||
| AVGO - SPY | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.47% | ||
| AMZN - SPY | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.75% | ||
| META - SPY | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.69% | ||
More | ||||