Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QKBGX vs RLBFX
QKBGX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts QKBGX vs RLBFX
Federated Hermes MDT Balanced R6
Price$23.64
Change+$0.05 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets299.61M
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$39.08
Change+$0.04 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets265.62B
QKBGX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QKBGX vs. RLBFX commentary
Oct 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QKBGX is a Hold and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 266B vs. QKBGX (300M). RLBFX pays higher dividends than QKBGX: RLBFX (2.00) vs QKBGX (1.43). QKBGX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: QKBGX (19 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). QKBGX (1.05) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). QKBGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). QKBGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBFX: QKBGX (0) vs RLBFX (250). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.05 vs. QKBGX (2.30). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.90 vs. QKBGX (24.45).
| QKBGX | RLBFX | QKBGX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.29 | 362% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.29 | 362% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.404 | 14.890 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 300M | 266B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.43 | 2.00 | 72% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.30 | 9.05 | 25% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.98 | 51.85 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.45 | 43.90 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.79 | 78.80 | 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers