Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QKBGX vs RLBFX
QKBGX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts QKBGX vs RLBFX
Federated Hermes MDT Balanced R6
Price$23.73
Change-$0.26 (-1.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets305.35M
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$39.15
Change-$0.48 (-1.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets268.67B
QKBGX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QKBGX vs. RLBFX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QKBGX is a Hold and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 269B vs. QKBGX (305M). RLBFX pays higher dividends than QKBGX: RLBFX (1.97) vs QKBGX (1.42). QKBGX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: QKBGX (19 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). QKBGX (1.05) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). QKBGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). QKBGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBFX: QKBGX (0) vs RLBFX (250). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.28 vs. QKBGX (1.95). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.06 vs. QKBGX (23.11).
| QKBGX | RLBFX | QKBGX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.29 | 362% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.29 | 362% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.054 | 16.507 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 305M | 269B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.42 | 1.97 | 72% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.95 | 10.28 | 19% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.28 | 44.74 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.11 | 43.06 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.34 | 81.39 | 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement