Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QKBGX vs RLBAX
QKBGX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts QKBGX vs RLBAX
Federated Hermes MDT Balanced R6
Price$24.08
Change+$0.09 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets305.26M
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$39.42
Change+$0.11 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets269.37B
QKBGX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QKBGX vs. RLBAX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QKBGX is a Buy and RLBAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 269B vs. QKBGX (305M). QKBGX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: QKBGX (1.42) vs RLBAX (1.07). QKBGX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: QKBGX (19 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than QKBGX (1.05). QKBGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. RLBAX (44.00). QKBGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: QKBGX (0) vs RLBAX (250). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.44 vs. QKBGX (0.31). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 34.78 vs. QKBGX (19.72).
| QKBGX | RLBAX | QKBGX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.31 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.31 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.818 | 15.776 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 305M | 269B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.42 | 1.07 | 133% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.31 | 8.44 | 4% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.60 | 37.26 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.72 | 34.78 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.94 | 66.67 | 94% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement