Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QKBGX vs RLBAX
QKBGX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts QKBGX vs RLBAX
Federated Hermes MDT Balanced R6
Price$23.64
Change+$0.05 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets299.61M
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$38.62
Change+$0.04 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets265.62B
QKBGX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QKBGX vs. RLBAX commentary
Oct 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QKBGX is a Hold and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 266B vs. QKBGX (300M). QKBGX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: QKBGX (1.43) vs RLBAX (1.10). QKBGX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: QKBGX (19 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than QKBGX (1.05). QKBGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. RLBAX (44.00). QKBGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: QKBGX (0) vs RLBAX (250). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.84 vs. QKBGX (2.30). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 37.69 vs. QKBGX (24.45).
| QKBGX | RLBAX | QKBGX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.31 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.31 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.404 | 13.947 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 300M | 266B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.43 | 1.10 | 130% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.30 | 7.84 | 29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.98 | 47.39 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.45 | 37.69 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.79 | 67.66 | 91% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers