Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QKACX vs VITSX
QKACX vs VITSX Comparison
Open Charts QKACX vs VITSX
Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core R6
Price$50.88
Change-$0.15 (-0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.44B
Vanguard Total Stock Market Idx I
Price$154.06
Change-$0.41 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.91T
QKACX vs VITSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QKACX vs. VITSX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QKACX is a Buy and VITSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VITSX has more cash in the bank: 1.91T vs. QKACX (2.44B). VITSX pays higher dividends than QKACX: VITSX (1.19) vs QKACX (0.41). QKACX was incepted earlier than VITSX: QKACX (19 years) vs VITSX (28 years). QKACX (0.86) is less costly to investors than VITSX (0.03). QKACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. VITSX (2.00). QKACX has a lower initial minimum investment than VITSX: QKACX (0) vs VITSX (5000000). VITSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.21 vs. QKACX (14.82). VITSX return over 5 years is better than : 85.84 vs. QKACX (61.70).
| QKACX | VITSX | QKACX / VITSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.03 | 2,467% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.03 | 2,867% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.927 | 9.274 | 150% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.44B | 1.91T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.41 | 1.19 | 34% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.82 | 16.21 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.98 | 46.82 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.70 | 85.84 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 144.41 | 203.16 | 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement