Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QKACX vs RWMFX
QKACX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts QKACX vs RWMFX
Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core R6
Price$51.61
Change+$0.21 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.72B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.77
Change+$0.28 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets205.87B
QKACX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QKACX vs. RWMFX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QKACX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 206B vs. QKACX (2.72B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than QKACX: RWMFX (1.42) vs QKACX (0.40). QKACX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: QKACX (19 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). QKACX (0.85) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). QKACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). QKACX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: QKACX (0) vs RWMFX (250). QKACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.82 vs. RWMFX (4.12). QKACX return over 5 years is better than : 60.50 vs. RWMFX (50.29).
| QKACX | RWMFX | QKACX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.31 | 239% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.31 | 274% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.562 | 9.760 | 159% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.72B | 206B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.40 | 1.42 | 28% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.82 | 4.12 | 214% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.77 | 41.84 | 155% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.50 | 50.29 | 120% |
| Returns for 10 years | 160.68 | 79.57 | 202% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement