Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QKACX vs RWEBX
QKACX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts QKACX vs RWEBX
Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core R6
Price$51.61
Change+$0.21 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.72B
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$66.32
Change+$0.27 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets205.87B
QKACX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QKACX vs. RWEBX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QKACX is a Hold and RWEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 206B vs. QKACX (2.72B). RWEBX pays higher dividends than QKACX: RWEBX (0.76) vs QKACX (0.40). QKACX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: QKACX (19 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). RWEBX (1.06) is less costly to investors than QKACX (0.85). QKACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. RWEBX (29.00). QKACX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWEBX: QKACX (0) vs RWEBX (250). QKACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.82 vs. RWEBX (3.29). QKACX return over 5 years is better than : 60.50 vs. RWEBX (45.88).
| QKACX | RWEBX | QKACX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.06 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.06 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.562 | 9.079 | 171% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.72B | 206B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.40 | 0.76 | 52% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.82 | 3.29 | 268% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.77 | 38.78 | 167% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.50 | 45.88 | 132% |
| Returns for 10 years | 160.68 | 73.45 | 219% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement