Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QISGX vs WCMLX
QISGX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts QISGX vs WCMLX
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Growth IS
Price$33.12
Change+$0.53 (+1.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets655.84M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$14.64
Change+$0.83 (+6.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.08M
QISGX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QISGX vs. WCMLX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QISGX is a StrongBuy and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QISGX has more cash in the bank: 656M vs. WCMLX (47.1M). QISGX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . QISGX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: QISGX (20 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than QISGX (1.13). QISGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 91.00 vs. WCMLX (83.00). WCMLX has a lower initial minimum investment than QISGX: WCMLX (100000) vs QISGX (1000000). QISGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.21 vs. WCMLX (8.52). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -5.30 vs. QISGX (-6.98).
| QISGX | WCMLX | QISGX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.99 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 1.79 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.447 | 6.395 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 656M | 47.1M | 1,393% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.21 | 8.52 | 190% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.28 | 19.51 | 206% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.98 | -5.30 | 132% |
| Returns for 10 years | 135.96 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement