Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QINT vs SCHF
QINT vs SCHF Comparison
Open Charts QINT vs SCHF
American Century Quality Dvrs Intl ETF
Price$61.51
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$25.43K
Net Assets411.45M
Schwab International Equity ETF™
Price$23.64
Change+$0.03 (+0.13%)
Volume$7.8M
Net Assets51.96B
QINT vs SCHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QINT vs. SCHF commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QINT is a Buy and SCHF is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHF has more net assets: 52B vs. QINT (411M). QINT has a higher annual dividend yield than SCHF: QINT (30.645) vs SCHF (28.626). QINT was incepted earlier than SCHF: QINT (7 years) vs SCHF (16 years). SCHF (0.03) has a lower expense ratio than QINT (0.39). QINT has a higher turnover SCHF (4.00) vs SCHF (4.00).
| QINT | SCHF | QINT / SCHF | |
| Gain YTD | 30.645 | 28.626 | 107% |
| Net Assets | 411M | 52B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.03 | 1,300% |
| Turnover | 78.00 | 4.00 | 1,950% |
| Yield | 2.50 | 2.42 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 16 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| QINT | SCHF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 75% | 9 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
QINT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QINT has been closely correlated with SAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QINT jumps, then SAN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QINT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QINT | 100% | -0.00% | ||
| SAN - QINT | 74% Closely correlated | -1.31% | ||
| SLF - QINT | 72% Closely correlated | -0.66% | ||
| BN - QINT | 70% Closely correlated | +1.00% | ||
| MFC - QINT | 68% Closely correlated | -0.03% | ||
| MT - QINT | 68% Closely correlated | -0.77% | ||
More | ||||
SCHF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHF has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCHF jumps, then STM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHF | 100% | +0.13% | ||
| STM - SCHF | 79% Closely correlated | -0.31% | ||
| SAN - SCHF | 71% Closely correlated | -1.31% | ||
| BN - SCHF | 71% Closely correlated | +1.00% | ||
| MT - SCHF | 68% Closely correlated | -0.77% | ||
| MFC - SCHF | 68% Closely correlated | -0.03% | ||
More | ||||