Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QINT vs SCHF
QINT vs SCHF Comparison
Open Charts QINT vs SCHF
American Century Quality Dvrs Intl ETF
Price$62.80
Change-$0.56 (-0.88%)
Volume$21.48K
Net Assets419.8M
Schwab International Equity ETF™
Price$23.97
Change-$0.29 (-1.20%)
Volume$12.06M
Net Assets53.7B
QINT vs SCHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QINT vs. SCHF commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QINT is a Buy and SCHF is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHF has more net assets: 53.7B vs. QINT (420M). QINT has a higher annual dividend yield than SCHF: QINT (34.580) vs SCHF (32.000). QINT was incepted earlier than SCHF: QINT (7 years) vs SCHF (16 years). SCHF (0.03) has a lower expense ratio than QINT (0.39). QINT has a higher turnover SCHF (4.00) vs SCHF (4.00).
| QINT | SCHF | QINT / SCHF | |
| Gain YTD | 34.580 | 32.000 | 108% |
| Net Assets | 420M | 53.7B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.03 | 1,300% |
| Turnover | 78.00 | 4.00 | 1,950% |
| Yield | 2.49 | 2.38 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 16 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| QINT | SCHF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 66% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
QINT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QINT has been closely correlated with SAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QINT jumps, then SAN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QINT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QINT | 100% | +0.65% | ||
| SAN - QINT | 74% Closely correlated | +2.41% | ||
| SLF - QINT | 72% Closely correlated | +2.02% | ||
| BN - QINT | 70% Closely correlated | +1.58% | ||
| MFC - QINT | 68% Closely correlated | +2.65% | ||
| MT - QINT | 68% Closely correlated | +1.95% | ||
More | ||||
SCHF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHF has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCHF jumps, then STM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHF | 100% | +0.71% | ||
| STM - SCHF | 79% Closely correlated | +1.27% | ||
| SAN - SCHF | 72% Closely correlated | +2.41% | ||
| BN - SCHF | 71% Closely correlated | +1.58% | ||
| BBVA - SCHF | 68% Closely correlated | +1.77% | ||
| MFG - SCHF | 68% Closely correlated | +1.04% | ||
More | ||||