Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QIACX vs RWEBX
QIACX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts QIACX vs RWEBX
Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core IS
Price$53.09
Change+$0.23 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.72B
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$66.32
Change+$0.27 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets206.71B
QIACX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QIACX vs. RWEBX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QIACX is a Hold and RWEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 207B vs. QIACX (2.72B). RWEBX pays higher dividends than QIACX: RWEBX (0.76) vs QIACX (0.38). QIACX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: QIACX (23 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). RWEBX (1.06) is less costly to investors than QIACX (0.92). QIACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. RWEBX (29.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than QIACX: RWEBX (250) vs QIACX (1000000). QIACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.05 vs. RWEBX (3.29). QIACX return over 5 years is better than : 61.82 vs. RWEBX (45.88).
| QIACX | RWEBX | QIACX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.06 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 1.06 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.564 | 9.079 | 171% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.72B | 207B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.38 | 0.76 | 50% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.05 | 3.29 | 275% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.48 | 38.78 | 169% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.82 | 45.88 | 135% |
| Returns for 10 years | 165.34 | 73.45 | 225% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement