QGLDF
Price
$0.01
Change
-$0.09 (-90.00%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
616.13K
RCGCF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.01 (-14.29%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
45.93M
Interact to see
Advertisement

QGLDF vs RCGCF

Header iconQGLDF vs RCGCF Comparison
Open Charts QGLDF vs RCGCFBanner chart's image
Q-Gold Resources
Price$0.01
Change-$0.09 (-90.00%)
Volume$600
Capitalization616.13K
ROSCAN GOLD
Price$0.06
Change-$0.01 (-14.29%)
Volume$13.96K
Capitalization45.93M
QGLDF vs RCGCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
QGLDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RCGCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
QGLDF vs. RCGCF commentary
Jul 21, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QGLDF is a Hold and RCGCF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 21, 2025
Stock price -- (QGLDF: $0.01 vs. RCGCF: $0.06)
Brand notoriety: QGLDF and RCGCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: QGLDF: 181% vs. RCGCF: 12%
Market capitalization -- QGLDF: $616.13K vs. RCGCF: $45.93M
QGLDF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $616.13K. RCGCF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $45.93M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

QGLDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRCGCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • QGLDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RCGCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, RCGCF is a better buy in the long-term than QGLDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

QGLDF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RCGCF’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • QGLDF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • RCGCF’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RCGCF is a better buy in the short-term than QGLDF.

Price Growth

QGLDF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -87.62% price change this week, while RCGCF (@Precious Metals) price change was +12.11% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +52.18%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.21% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RCGCF($45.9M) has a higher market cap than QGLDF($616K). RCGCF YTD gains are higher at: 51.756 vs. QGLDF (-85.426). QGLDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.75M vs. RCGCF (-6.91M). RCGCF has more cash in the bank: 115K vs. QGLDF (12K). RCGCF has less debt than QGLDF: RCGCF (0) vs QGLDF (300K). QGLDF (0) and RCGCF (0) have equivalent revenues.
QGLDFRCGCFQGLDF / RCGCF
Capitalization616K45.9M1%
EBITDA-1.75M-6.91M25%
Gain YTD-85.42651.756-165%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash12K115K10%
Total Debt300K0-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
QGLDF vs RCGCF: Fundamental Ratings
QGLDF
RCGCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5030
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
85
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9838
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RCGCF's Valuation (85) in the null industry is in the same range as QGLDF (92). This means that RCGCF’s stock grew similarly to QGLDF’s over the last 12 months.

RCGCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as QGLDF (100). This means that RCGCF’s stock grew similarly to QGLDF’s over the last 12 months.

RCGCF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as QGLDF (100). This means that RCGCF’s stock grew similarly to QGLDF’s over the last 12 months.

RCGCF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QGLDF (98). This means that RCGCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than QGLDF’s over the last 12 months.

RCGCF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as QGLDF (100). This means that RCGCF’s stock grew similarly to QGLDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QGLDFRCGCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
QGLDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RCGCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ABCFF0.01N/A
+6.84%
Abacus Mining & Exploration Corp.
DCYHY27.15N/A
N/A
Discovery Holdings Ltd.
KHNGF217.91N/A
N/A
Kuehne & Nagel International AG
BCEKF0.14N/A
-1.00%
Bear Creek Mining Corp.
BELGF0.61-0.02
-3.79%
Bellevue Gold, Ltd.

QGLDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that QGLDF and CAPTF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QGLDF and CAPTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QGLDF
1D Price
Change %
QGLDF100%
-87.62%
CAPTF - QGLDF
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.48%
JDNRF - QGLDF
4%
Poorly correlated
-18.25%
RCGCF - QGLDF
3%
Poorly correlated
-2.99%
RDEXF - QGLDF
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.48%
RDUFF - QGLDF
-3%
Poorly correlated
+25.00%
More

RCGCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RCGCF and TORXF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RCGCF and TORXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RCGCF
1D Price
Change %
RCGCF100%
-2.99%
TORXF - RCGCF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.12%
AGPPF - RCGCF
21%
Poorly correlated
+3.88%
STLRF - RCGCF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.97%
RIOFF - RCGCF
13%
Poorly correlated
+1.53%
PROBF - RCGCF
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.79%
More