Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QDF vs SCHD
QDF vs SCHD Comparison
Open Charts QDF vs SCHD
FlexShares Quality Dividend ETF
Price$74.52
Change+$0.56 (+0.76%)
Volume$14.5K
Net Assets1.89B
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF™
Price$27.35
Change+$0.04 (+0.15%)
Volume$8.82M
Net Assets71.27B
QDF vs SCHD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QDF vs. SCHD commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QDF is a Buy and SCHD is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHD has more net assets: 71.3B vs. QDF (1.89B). QDF has a higher annual dividend yield than SCHD: QDF (6.440) vs SCHD (2.005). QDF was incepted earlier than SCHD: QDF (13 years) vs SCHD (14 years). SCHD (0.06) has a lower expense ratio than QDF (0.37). QDF has a higher turnover SCHD (29.00) vs SCHD (29.00).
| QDF | SCHD | QDF / SCHD | |
| Gain YTD | 6.440 | 2.005 | 321% |
| Net Assets | 1.89B | 71.3B | 3% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.37 | 0.06 | 617% |
| Turnover | 38.00 | 29.00 | 131% |
| Yield | 1.86 | 3.87 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| QDF | SCHD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 18 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
QDF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QDF has been closely correlated with PH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QDF jumps, then PH could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QDF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QDF | 100% | +0.76% | ||
| PH - QDF | 81% Closely correlated | +1.08% | ||
| IVZ - QDF | 80% Closely correlated | +0.84% | ||
| MS - QDF | 77% Closely correlated | +0.90% | ||
| NXPI - QDF | 76% Closely correlated | +0.41% | ||
| MCHP - QDF | 75% Closely correlated | -0.14% | ||
More | ||||
SCHD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHD has been closely correlated with APAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCHD jumps, then APAM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHD | 100% | +0.15% | ||
| APAM - SCHD | 75% Closely correlated | -0.02% | ||
| HBAN - SCHD | 74% Closely correlated | +0.80% | ||
| BLK - SCHD | 74% Closely correlated | +1.08% | ||
| USB - SCHD | 71% Closely correlated | +0.93% | ||
| CNS - SCHD | 71% Closely correlated | +0.18% | ||
More | ||||