Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QDEF vs VYM
QDEF vs VYM Comparison
Open Charts QDEF vs VYM
FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensv ETF
Price$82.37
Change+$2.58 (+3.23%)
Volume$43.07K
Net Assets504.56M
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Price$151.94
Change+$11.62 (+8.28%)
Volume$2.17M
Net Assets84.52B
QDEF vs VYM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QDEF vs. VYM commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QDEF is a Buy and VYM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VYM has more net assets: 84.5B vs. QDEF (505M). VYM has a higher annual dividend yield than QDEF: VYM (5.867) vs QDEF (1.745). QDEF was incepted earlier than VYM: QDEF (13 years) vs VYM (19 years). VYM (0.06) has a lower expense ratio than QDEF (0.37). QDEF has a higher turnover VYM (13.00) vs VYM (13.00).
| QDEF | VYM | QDEF / VYM | |
| Gain YTD | 1.745 | 5.867 | 30% |
| Net Assets | 505M | 84.5B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.37 | 0.06 | 617% |
| Turnover | 41.00 | 13.00 | 315% |
| Yield | 1.71 | 2.33 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 19 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| QDEF | VYM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 86% | 1 day ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 68% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
QDEF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QDEF has been closely correlated with MET. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QDEF jumps, then MET could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QDEF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QDEF | 100% | -0.46% | ||
| MET - QDEF | 75% Closely correlated | -2.98% | ||
| TFC - QDEF | 74% Closely correlated | +2.60% | ||
| AAPL - QDEF | 73% Closely correlated | -0.20% | ||
| CSCO - QDEF | 73% Closely correlated | +3.06% | ||
| BK - QDEF | 73% Closely correlated | -1.88% | ||
More | ||||
VYM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VYM has been closely correlated with TFC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VYM jumps, then TFC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VYM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VYM | 100% | +0.60% | ||
| TFC - VYM | 76% Closely correlated | +2.60% | ||
| HBAN - VYM | 75% Closely correlated | +2.85% | ||
| RF - VYM | 75% Closely correlated | +2.44% | ||
| APAM - VYM | 75% Closely correlated | -1.94% | ||
| TKR - VYM | 74% Closely correlated | +1.21% | ||
More | ||||