Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QDEF vs VTV
QDEF vs VTV Comparison
Open Charts QDEF vs VTV
FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensv ETF
Price$82.37
Change+$2.58 (+3.23%)
Volume$43.07K
Net Assets504.56M
Vanguard Value ETF
Price$202.47
Change+$16.42 (+8.83%)
Volume$4.16M
Net Assets217.68B
QDEF vs VTV Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QDEF vs. VTV commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QDEF is a Buy and VTV is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTV has more net assets: 218B vs. QDEF (505M). VTV has a higher annual dividend yield than QDEF: VTV (6.011) vs QDEF (1.745). QDEF was incepted earlier than VTV: QDEF (13 years) vs VTV (22 years). VTV (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than QDEF (0.37). QDEF has a higher turnover VTV (9.00) vs VTV (9.00).
| QDEF | VTV | QDEF / VTV | |
| Gain YTD | 1.745 | 6.011 | 29% |
| Net Assets | 505M | 218B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.37 | 0.04 | 925% |
| Turnover | 41.00 | 9.00 | 456% |
| Yield | 1.71 | 1.96 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 22 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| QDEF | VTV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 64% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 86% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 68% | 16 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
QDEF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QDEF has been closely correlated with MET. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QDEF jumps, then MET could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QDEF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QDEF | 100% | -0.46% | ||
| MET - QDEF | 75% Closely correlated | -2.98% | ||
| TFC - QDEF | 74% Closely correlated | +2.60% | ||
| AAPL - QDEF | 73% Closely correlated | -0.20% | ||
| CSCO - QDEF | 73% Closely correlated | +3.06% | ||
| BK - QDEF | 73% Closely correlated | -1.88% | ||
More | ||||
VTV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VTV has been closely correlated with PFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VTV jumps, then PFG could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y