Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QDEF vs SCHD
QDEF vs SCHD Comparison
Open Charts QDEF vs SCHD
FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensv ETF
Price$78.69
Change+$0.06 (+0.08%)
Volume$200
Net Assets470.03M
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF™
Price$27.33
Change-$0.31 (-1.12%)
Volume$4.97K
Net Assets71.93B
QDEF vs SCHD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QDEF vs. SCHD commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QDEF is a Hold and SCHD is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHD has more net assets: 71.9B vs. QDEF (470M). QDEF has a higher annual dividend yield than SCHD: QDEF (12.840) vs SCHD (3.087). QDEF was incepted earlier than SCHD: QDEF (13 years) vs SCHD (14 years). SCHD (0.06) has a lower expense ratio than QDEF (0.37). QDEF has a higher turnover SCHD (29.00) vs SCHD (29.00).
| QDEF | SCHD | QDEF / SCHD | |
| Gain YTD | 12.840 | 3.087 | 416% |
| Net Assets | 470M | 71.9B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.37 | 0.06 | 617% |
| Turnover | 50.00 | 29.00 | 172% |
| Yield | 1.70 | 3.67 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| QDEF | SCHD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | 4 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 58% | 4 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 65% | 4 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 18 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 70% | 6 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 72% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
QDEF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QDEF has been closely correlated with MET. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QDEF jumps, then MET could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QDEF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QDEF | 100% | +0.11% | ||
| MET - QDEF | 75% Closely correlated | -2.74% | ||
| CSCO - QDEF | 74% Closely correlated | -1.60% | ||
| BK - QDEF | 74% Closely correlated | -1.77% | ||
| AAPL - QDEF | 74% Closely correlated | -0.04% | ||
| MA - QDEF | 73% Closely correlated | -1.92% | ||
More | ||||
SCHD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHD has been closely correlated with TROW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCHD jumps, then TROW could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHD | 100% | -0.18% | ||
| TROW - SCHD | 76% Closely correlated | -3.01% | ||
| FITB - SCHD | 76% Closely correlated | -1.38% | ||
| USB - SCHD | 75% Closely correlated | -0.75% | ||
| RF - SCHD | 74% Closely correlated | -1.21% | ||
| APAM - SCHD | 74% Closely correlated | -1.47% | ||
More | ||||