Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QDARX vs WMNAX
QDARX vs WMNAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QDARX vs. WMNAX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QDARX is a Hold and WMNAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QDARX has more cash in the bank: 2.2B vs. WMNAX (146M). WMNAX pays higher dividends than QDARX: WMNAX (2.35) vs QDARX (2.20). QDARX was incepted earlier than WMNAX: QDARX (11 years) vs WMNAX (6 years). QDARX (1.78) is less costly to investors than WMNAX (1.33). QDARX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 361.00 vs. WMNAX (89.00). WMNAX has a lower initial minimum investment than QDARX: WMNAX (1000) vs QDARX (50000000). QDARX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.50 vs. WMNAX (7.76). WMNAX return over 5 years is better than : 21.38 vs. QDARX (11.55).
| QDARX | WMNAX | QDARX / WMNAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 1.10 | 161% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.78 | 1.33 | 134% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.093 | 1.262 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 50000000 | 1000 | 5,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.2B | 146M | 1,509% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.20 | 2.35 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.50 | 7.76 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.61 | 21.09 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.55 | 21.38 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.98 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement