Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCLVX vs RMFCX
QCLVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts QCLVX vs RMFCX
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value C
Price$34.56
Change+$0.14 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.94B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.51
Change+$0.17 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.88B
QCLVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCLVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCLVX is a StrongBuy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. QCLVX (1.94B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than QCLVX: RMFCX (1.20) vs QCLVX (0.20). QCLVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: QCLVX (8 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). QCLVX (1.92) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). QCLVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCLVX: RMFCX (250) vs QCLVX (1500). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.96 vs. QCLVX (-3.86). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 57.10 vs. QCLVX (31.92).
| QCLVX | RMFCX | QCLVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.91 | 199% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 0.91 | 211% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.486 | 13.689 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.94B | 111B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 1.20 | 16% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.86 | 4.96 | -78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.84 | 38.79 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.92 | 57.10 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 91.18 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement