Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCLVX vs RMFCX
QCLVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts QCLVX vs RMFCX
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value C
Price$36.07
Change-$0.13 (-0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.21B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.14
Change-$1.74 (-2.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.52B
QCLVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCLVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCLVX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. QCLVX (2.21B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than QCLVX: RMFCX (1.24) vs QCLVX (0.07). QCLVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: QCLVX (8 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). QCLVX (1.88) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). QCLVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCLVX: RMFCX (250) vs QCLVX (1500). QCLVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.15 vs. RMFCX (7.45). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 44.16 vs. QCLVX (22.52).
| QCLVX | RMFCX | QCLVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.91 | 199% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.88 | 0.91 | 207% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.383 | 2.244 | 195% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.21B | 112B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 1.24 | 6% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.15 | 7.45 | 177% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.51 | 28.73 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.52 | 44.16 | 51% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 105.79 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement