Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCLVX vs RMEBX
QCLVX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts QCLVX vs RMEBX
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value C
Price$34.56
Change+$0.14 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.94B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$61.85
Change+$0.16 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.88B
QCLVX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCLVX vs. RMEBX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCLVX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. QCLVX (1.94B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than QCLVX: RMEBX (1.05) vs QCLVX (0.20). QCLVX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: QCLVX (8 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). QCLVX (1.92) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). QCLVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCLVX: RMEBX (250) vs QCLVX (1500). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.81 vs. QCLVX (-3.47). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 55.95 vs. QCLVX (32.46).
| QCLVX | RMEBX | QCLVX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 1.07 | 169% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 1.07 | 179% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.940 | 13.527 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.94B | 111B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 1.05 | 19% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.47 | 4.81 | -72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.35 | 38.19 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.46 | 55.95 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 89.36 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement