Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCLN vs TAN
QCLN vs TAN Comparison
Open Charts QCLN vs TAN
First Trust NASDAQ® Cln Edge® GrnEngyETF
Price$37.03
Change+$0.42 (+1.15%)
Volume$45.08K
Net Assets444.28M
Invesco Solar ETF
Price$39.11
Change-$0.02 (-0.05%)
Volume$187.77K
Net Assets681.8M
QCLN vs TAN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCLN vs. TAN commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCLN is a StrongBuy and TAN is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TAN has more net assets: 682M vs. QCLN (444M). TAN has a higher annual dividend yield than QCLN: TAN (18.086) vs QCLN (9.256). QCLN was incepted earlier than TAN: QCLN (18 years) vs TAN (17 years). QCLN (0.59) has a lower expense ratio than TAN (0.71). TAN has a higher turnover QCLN (29.00) vs QCLN (29.00).
| QCLN | TAN | QCLN / TAN | |
| Gain YTD | 9.256 | 18.086 | 51% |
| Net Assets | 444M | 682M | 65% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.71 | 83% |
| Turnover | 29.00 | 43.00 | 67% |
| Yield | 0.47 | 0.48 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 17 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| QCLN | TAN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
QCLN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QCLN has been closely correlated with ON. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QCLN jumps, then ON could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QCLN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QCLN | 100% | +1.14% | ||
| ON - QCLN | 74% Closely correlated | +2.67% | ||
| ALB - QCLN | 71% Closely correlated | -0.52% | ||
| POWI - QCLN | 70% Closely correlated | -0.70% | ||
| FCEL - QCLN | 69% Closely correlated | -0.71% | ||
| BLDP - QCLN | 68% Closely correlated | +1.43% | ||
More | ||||
TAN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TAN has been closely correlated with CSIQ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TAN jumps, then CSIQ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TAN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TAN | 100% | -0.05% | ||
| CSIQ - TAN | 77% Closely correlated | -0.78% | ||
| FSLR - TAN | 75% Closely correlated | +2.55% | ||
| SEDG - TAN | 75% Closely correlated | -4.36% | ||
| RUN - TAN | 71% Closely correlated | +1.89% | ||
| ENPH - TAN | 69% Closely correlated | -0.30% | ||
More | ||||