Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCLN vs TAN
QCLN vs TAN Comparison
Open Charts QCLN vs TAN
First Trust NASDAQ® Cln Edge® GrnEngyETF
Price$38.26
Change+$0.80 (+2.14%)
Volume$122.32K
Net Assets457.29M
Invesco Solar ETF
Price$44.04
Change+$2.02 (+4.81%)
Volume$1.55M
Net Assets761.55M
QCLN vs TAN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCLN vs. TAN commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCLN is a Buy and TAN is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TAN has more net assets: 762M vs. QCLN (457M). TAN has a higher annual dividend yield than QCLN: TAN (32.971) vs QCLN (12.897). QCLN was incepted earlier than TAN: QCLN (19 years) vs TAN (17 years). QCLN (0.59) has a lower expense ratio than TAN (0.71). TAN has a higher turnover QCLN (29.00) vs QCLN (29.00).
| QCLN | TAN | QCLN / TAN | |
| Gain YTD | 12.897 | 32.971 | 39% |
| Net Assets | 457M | 762M | 60% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.71 | 83% |
| Turnover | 29.00 | 43.00 | 67% |
| Yield | 0.41 | 0.40 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 17 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| QCLN | TAN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 90% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
QCLN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QCLN has been closely correlated with ALB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QCLN jumps, then ALB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QCLN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QCLN | 100% | +2.14% | ||
| ALB - QCLN | 70% Closely correlated | +2.86% | ||
| ON - QCLN | 70% Closely correlated | +2.17% | ||
| AEIS - QCLN | 69% Closely correlated | +2.40% | ||
| POWI - QCLN | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.40% | ||
| ALGM - QCLN | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.56% | ||
More | ||||
TAN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TAN has been closely correlated with FSLR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TAN jumps, then FSLR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TAN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TAN | 100% | +4.81% | ||
| FSLR - TAN | 75% Closely correlated | +1.62% | ||
| CSIQ - TAN | 74% Closely correlated | +15.04% | ||
| SEDG - TAN | 73% Closely correlated | +0.76% | ||
| RUN - TAN | 70% Closely correlated | +10.65% | ||
| ENPH - TAN | 68% Closely correlated | +8.57% | ||
More | ||||