Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCLGX vs VIGRX
QCLGX vs VIGRX Comparison
Open Charts QCLGX vs VIGRX
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth C
Price$28.45
Change-$0.63 (-2.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.11B
Vanguard Growth Index Investor
Price$248.63
Change-$5.44 (-2.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets357.2B
QCLGX vs VIGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCLGX vs. VIGRX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCLGX is a Hold and VIGRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIGRX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. QCLGX (4.12B). VIGRX pays higher dividends than QCLGX: VIGRX (0.30) vs QCLGX (0.00). QCLGX was incepted earlier than VIGRX: QCLGX (20 years) vs VIGRX (33 years). QCLGX (1.86) is less costly to investors than VIGRX (0.17). QCLGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. VIGRX (11.00). QCLGX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIGRX: QCLGX (1500) vs VIGRX (3000). VIGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.27 vs. QCLGX (8.13). VIGRX return over 5 years is better than : 102.79 vs. QCLGX (24.07).
| QCLGX | VIGRX | QCLGX / VIGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.79 | 0.17 | 1,053% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 0.17 | 1,094% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.810 | 17.672 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 3000 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.12B | 357B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.30 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.13 | 18.27 | 45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.28 | 112.63 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.07 | 102.79 | 23% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.46 | 351.51 | 24% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement