Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCLGX vs VIGRX
QCLGX vs VIGRX Comparison
Open Charts QCLGX vs VIGRX
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth C
Price$27.52
Change+$0.11 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.24B
Vanguard Growth Index Investor
Price$234.74
Change+$0.93 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets311.95B
QCLGX vs VIGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCLGX vs. VIGRX commentary
Jul 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCLGX is a Buy and VIGRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIGRX has more cash in the bank: 312B vs. QCLGX (3.24B). VIGRX pays higher dividends than QCLGX: VIGRX (0.34) vs QCLGX (0.00). QCLGX was incepted earlier than VIGRX: QCLGX (20 years) vs VIGRX (33 years). QCLGX (1.88) is less costly to investors than VIGRX (0.17). QCLGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. VIGRX (11.00). QCLGX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIGRX: QCLGX (1500) vs VIGRX (3000). VIGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.04 vs. QCLGX (20.54). VIGRX return over 5 years is better than : 113.28 vs. QCLGX (30.71).
| QCLGX | VIGRX | QCLGX / VIGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 0.17 | 1,029% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.88 | 0.17 | 1,106% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.613 | 11.098 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 3000 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.24B | 312B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.34 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.54 | 26.04 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.68 | 80.95 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.71 | 113.28 | 27% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.75 | 314.35 | 22% |