Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCLGX vs RGEBX
QCLGX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts QCLGX vs RGEBX
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth C
Price$26.81
Change-$2.13 (-7.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.57B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$75.85
Change-$9.36 (-10.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
QCLGX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCLGX vs. RGEBX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCLGX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. QCLGX (4.57B). QCLGX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . QCLGX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: QCLGX (20 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). QCLGX (1.86) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.08). QCLGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RGEBX (32.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCLGX: RGEBX (250) vs QCLGX (1500). QCLGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.89 vs. RGEBX (1.80). QCLGX return over 5 years is better than : 15.46 vs. RGEBX (9.88).
| QCLGX | RGEBX | QCLGX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.79 | 1.08 | 166% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.08 | 172% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.422 | -1.057 | 324% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.57B | 336B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.89 | 1.80 | 272% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.04 | 41.63 | 161% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.46 | 9.88 | 156% |
| Returns for 10 years | 122.49 | 110.02 | 111% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers