Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCLGX vs RGAHX
QCLGX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts QCLGX vs RGAHX
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth C
Price$28.22
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.53B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$80.13
Change-$0.01 (-0.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
QCLGX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCLGX vs. RGAHX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCLGX is a Hold and RGAHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. QCLGX (4.53B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than QCLGX: RGAHX (0.44) vs QCLGX (0.00). QCLGX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: QCLGX (20 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). QCLGX (1.86) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). QCLGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RGAHX (32.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCLGX: RGAHX (250) vs QCLGX (1500). QCLGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.11 vs. RGAHX (5.91). QCLGX return over 5 years is better than : 26.83 vs. RGAHX (23.08).
| QCLGX | RGAHX | QCLGX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.79 | 0.44 | 407% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 0.44 | 423% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.882 | 9.109 | 152% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.53B | 339B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.44 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.11 | 5.91 | 171% |
| Returns for 3 years | 100.43 | 67.08 | 150% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.83 | 23.08 | 116% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.79 | 94.58 | 111% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement