Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCLGX vs RGAGX
QCLGX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts QCLGX vs RGAGX
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth C
Price$28.45
Change+$0.10 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.9B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$87.77
Change+$0.34 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.88B
QCLGX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCLGX vs. RGAGX commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCLGX is a Hold and RGAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. QCLGX (3.9B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than QCLGX: RGAGX (0.59) vs QCLGX (0.00). QCLGX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: QCLGX (20 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). QCLGX (1.88) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). QCLGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCLGX: RGAGX (250) vs QCLGX (1500). QCLGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.74 vs. RGAGX (13.24). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 49.92 vs. QCLGX (31.65).
| QCLGX | RGAGX | QCLGX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 0.30 | 583% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.88 | 0.30 | 627% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.810 | 17.733 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.9B | 337B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.59 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.74 | 13.24 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.69 | 74.37 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.65 | 49.92 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.53 | 118.54 | 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers