Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCLGX vs RGAFX
QCLGX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts QCLGX vs RGAFX
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth C
Price$28.79
Change+$0.33 (+1.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.04B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5
Price$89.09
Change+$1.12 (+1.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.91B
QCLGX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCLGX vs. RGAFX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCLGX is a Hold and RGAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. QCLGX (4.04B). RGAFX pays higher dividends than QCLGX: RGAFX (0.53) vs QCLGX (0.00). QCLGX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: QCLGX (20 years) vs RGAFX (23 years). QCLGX (1.86) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). QCLGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RGAFX (25.00). RGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCLGX: RGAFX (250) vs QCLGX (1500). QCLGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.39 vs. RGAFX (11.94). RGAFX return over 5 years is better than : 41.66 vs. QCLGX (24.61).
| QCLGX | RGAFX | QCLGX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.79 | 0.34 | 526% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 0.34 | 547% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.851 | 18.207 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.04B | 337B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.53 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.39 | 11.94 | 121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.52 | 73.49 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.61 | 41.66 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.45 | 103.34 | 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers