Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCLGX vs RGABX
QCLGX vs RGABX Comparison
Open Charts QCLGX vs RGABX
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth C
Price$28.79
Change+$0.33 (+1.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.04B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$78.86
Change+$0.99 (+1.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.91B
QCLGX vs RGABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCLGX vs. RGABX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCLGX is a Hold and RGABX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. QCLGX (4.04B). QCLGX (0.00) and RGABX (0.00) have matching dividends . QCLGX was incepted earlier than RGABX: QCLGX (20 years) vs RGABX (23 years). QCLGX (1.86) is less costly to investors than RGABX (1.39). QCLGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RGABX (25.00). RGABX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCLGX: RGABX (250) vs QCLGX (1500). QCLGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.39 vs. RGABX (9.77). RGABX return over 5 years is better than : 32.07 vs. QCLGX (24.61).
| QCLGX | RGABX | QCLGX / RGABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.79 | 1.39 | 129% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.39 | 134% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.851 | 17.239 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.04B | 337B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.39 | 9.77 | 147% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.52 | 65.96 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.61 | 32.07 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.45 | 84.44 | 100% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement