Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCLGX vs RGABX
QCLGX vs RGABX Comparison
Open Charts QCLGX vs RGABX
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth C
Price$28.45
Change+$0.10 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.9B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$77.58
Change+$0.30 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.88B
QCLGX vs RGABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCLGX vs. RGABX commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCLGX is a Hold and RGABX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. QCLGX (3.9B). QCLGX (0.00) and RGABX (0.00) have matching dividends . QCLGX was incepted earlier than RGABX: QCLGX (20 years) vs RGABX (23 years). QCLGX (1.88) is less costly to investors than RGABX (1.39). QCLGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RGABX (25.00). RGABX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCLGX: RGABX (250) vs QCLGX (1500). QCLGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.74 vs. RGABX (10.97). RGABX return over 5 years is better than : 39.53 vs. QCLGX (31.65).
| QCLGX | RGABX | QCLGX / RGABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 1.39 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.88 | 1.39 | 135% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.810 | 16.802 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.9B | 337B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.74 | 10.97 | 144% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.69 | 66.66 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.65 | 39.53 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.53 | 97.86 | 98% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers