Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCELX vs RWEBX
QCELX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts QCELX vs RWEBX
AQR Large Cap Multi-Style I
Price$21.75
Change+$0.23 (+1.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.26B
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$65.42
Change+$0.38 (+0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets204.51B
QCELX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCELX vs. RWEBX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCELX is a Buy and RWEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 205B vs. QCELX (1.26B). QCELX pays higher dividends than RWEBX: QCELX (1.04) vs RWEBX (0.78). QCELX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: QCELX (12 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). RWEBX (1.06) is less costly to investors than QCELX (0.42). QCELX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. RWEBX (29.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCELX: RWEBX (250) vs QCELX (5000000). QCELX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.21 vs. RWEBX (7.12). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 46.70 vs. QCELX (29.18).
| QCELX | RWEBX | QCELX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.06 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.42 | 1.06 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.167 | 7.651 | 211% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.26B | 205B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.04 | 0.78 | 134% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.21 | 7.12 | 172% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.63 | 32.20 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.18 | 46.70 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.62 | 77.32 | 102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement