QCCO
Price
$0.50
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
SYBT
Price
$74.43
Change
-$0.78 (-1.04%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
68 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

QCCO vs SYBT

Header iconQCCO vs SYBT Comparison
Open Charts QCCO vs SYBTBanner chart's image
QC Holdings
Price$0.50
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
Stock Yards Ban
Price$74.43
Change-$0.78 (-1.04%)
Volume$110.66K
CapitalizationN/A
QCCO vs SYBT Comparison Chart
Loading...
SYBT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
QCCO vs. SYBT commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCCO is a Hold and SYBT is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (QCCO: $0.50 vs. SYBT: $74.43)
Brand notoriety: QCCO and SYBT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: QCCO: 3% vs. SYBT: 56%
Market capitalization -- QCCO: $7.66M vs. SYBT: $1.4B
QCCO [@Regional Banks] is valued at $7.66M. SYBT’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.4B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.86B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

QCCO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSYBT’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • QCCO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SYBT’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, SYBT is a better buy in the long-term than QCCO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SYBT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SYBT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

QCCO (@Regional Banks) experienced а +51.52% price change this week, while SYBT (@Regional Banks) price change was +3.10% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.06%.

Reported Earning Dates

SYBT is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.80% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SYBT($1.4B) has a higher market cap than QCCO($7.66M). SYBT YTD gains are higher at: 47.250 vs. QCCO (-27.007). QCCO has less debt than SYBT: QCCO (6.52M) vs SYBT (227M). SYBT has higher revenues than QCCO: SYBT (333M) vs QCCO (140M).
QCCOSYBTQCCO / SYBT
Capitalization7.66M1.4B1%
EBITDA4.07MN/A-
Gain YTD-27.00747.250-57%
P/E RatioN/A13.01-
Revenue140M333M42%
Total Cash12.8MN/A-
Total Debt6.52M227M3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
QCCO vs SYBT: Fundamental Ratings
QCCO
SYBT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3162
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
2
Undervalued
98
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7231
SMR RATING
1..100
10017
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3937
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10018
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

QCCO's Valuation (2) in the Precious Metals industry is significantly better than the same rating for SYBT (98) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that QCCO’s stock grew significantly faster than SYBT’s over the last 12 months.

SYBT's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QCCO (72) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that SYBT’s stock grew somewhat faster than QCCO’s over the last 12 months.

SYBT's SMR Rating (17) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for QCCO (100) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that SYBT’s stock grew significantly faster than QCCO’s over the last 12 months.

SYBT's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as QCCO (39) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that SYBT’s stock grew similarly to QCCO’s over the last 12 months.

SYBT's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for QCCO (100) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that SYBT’s stock grew significantly faster than QCCO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SYBT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SYBT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

QCCO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that QCCO and BNCZF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QCCO and BNCZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QCCO
1D Price
Change %
QCCO100%
N/A
BNCZF - QCCO
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EFIN - QCCO
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SQCF - QCCO
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BOTJ - QCCO
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.21%
SYBT - QCCO
8%
Poorly correlated
-1.04%
More

SYBT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SYBT has been closely correlated with FCF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SYBT jumps, then FCF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SYBT
1D Price
Change %
SYBT100%
-1.04%
FCF - SYBT
86%
Closely correlated
-0.64%
UBSI - SYBT
86%
Closely correlated
-0.56%
LKFN - SYBT
85%
Closely correlated
-0.54%
CHCO - SYBT
85%
Closely correlated
-0.98%
FCBC - SYBT
84%
Closely correlated
-0.77%
More