Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCBGX vs RLBFX
QCBGX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts QCBGX vs RLBFX
Federated Hermes MDT Balanced C
Price$23.18
Change+$0.05 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets303.13M
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$39.83
Change+$0.07 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets271.11B
QCBGX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCBGX vs. RLBFX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCBGX is a Buy and RLBFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 271B vs. QCBGX (303M). RLBFX pays higher dividends than QCBGX: RLBFX (1.93) vs QCBGX (0.60). QCBGX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: QCBGX (20 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). QCBGX (2.11) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). QCBGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCBGX: RLBFX (250) vs QCBGX (1500). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.63 vs. QCBGX (-1.04). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.86 vs. QCBGX (12.71).
| QCBGX | RLBFX | QCBGX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.11 | 0.29 | 728% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.11 | 0.29 | 728% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.685 | 16.889 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 303M | 271B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 1.93 | 31% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.04 | 9.63 | -11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.03 | 41.38 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.71 | 40.86 | 31% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.15 | 77.79 | 63% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers