Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCBGX vs RLBFX
QCBGX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts QCBGX vs RLBFX
Federated Hermes MDT Balanced C
Price$21.64
Change-$1.31 (-5.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets318.51M
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$38.49
Change-$0.54 (-1.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets269.72B
QCBGX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCBGX vs. RLBFX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCBGX is a StrongBuy and RLBFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 270B vs. QCBGX (319M). RLBFX pays higher dividends than QCBGX: RLBFX (2.13) vs QCBGX (0.60). QCBGX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: QCBGX (20 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). QCBGX (2.11) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). QCBGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCBGX: RLBFX (250) vs QCBGX (1500). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.69 vs. QCBGX (2.60). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 37.38 vs. QCBGX (5.63).
| QCBGX | RLBFX | QCBGX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.11 | 0.29 | 728% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.11 | 0.29 | 728% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.278 | 2.503 | 11% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 319M | 270B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 2.13 | 28% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.60 | 11.69 | 22% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.11 | 38.02 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.63 | 37.38 | 15% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.24 | 91.94 | 57% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement