Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCBGX vs RLBEX
QCBGX vs RLBEX Comparison
Open Charts QCBGX vs RLBEX
Federated Hermes MDT Balanced C
Price$21.64
Change-$1.31 (-5.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets318.51M
American Funds American Balanced R4
Price$38.33
Change-$0.56 (-1.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets269.72B
QCBGX vs RLBEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCBGX vs. RLBEX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCBGX is a StrongBuy and RLBEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 270B vs. QCBGX (319M). RLBEX pays higher dividends than QCBGX: RLBEX (1.87) vs QCBGX (0.60). QCBGX was incepted earlier than RLBEX: QCBGX (20 years) vs RLBEX (24 years). QCBGX (2.11) is less costly to investors than RLBEX (0.59). QCBGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.00 vs. RLBEX (44.00). RLBEX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCBGX: RLBEX (250) vs QCBGX (1500). RLBEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.32 vs. QCBGX (2.60). RLBEX return over 5 years is better than : 35.56 vs. QCBGX (5.63).
| QCBGX | RLBEX | QCBGX / RLBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.11 | 0.59 | 358% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.11 | 0.59 | 358% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.278 | 2.459 | 11% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 319M | 270B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 1.87 | 32% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.60 | 11.32 | 23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.11 | 36.71 | 49% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.63 | 35.56 | 16% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.24 | 90.55 | 58% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement