Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCBGX vs RLBCX
QCBGX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts QCBGX vs RLBCX
Federated Hermes MDT Balanced C
Price$21.64
Change-$1.31 (-5.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets318.51M
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$38.13
Change-$0.57 (-1.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets269.72B
QCBGX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCBGX vs. RLBCX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCBGX is a StrongBuy and RLBCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 270B vs. QCBGX (319M). RLBCX pays higher dividends than QCBGX: RLBCX (1.62) vs QCBGX (0.60). QCBGX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: QCBGX (20 years) vs RLBCX (24 years). QCBGX (2.11) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). QCBGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). RLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCBGX: RLBCX (250) vs QCBGX (1500). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.97 vs. QCBGX (2.60). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 33.82 vs. QCBGX (5.63).
| QCBGX | RLBCX | QCBGX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.11 | 0.89 | 237% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.11 | 0.89 | 237% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.278 | 2.445 | 11% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 319M | 270B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 1.62 | 37% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.60 | 10.97 | 24% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.11 | 35.49 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.63 | 33.82 | 17% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.24 | 84.49 | 62% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement