Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCBGX vs RLBCX
QCBGX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts QCBGX vs RLBCX
Federated Hermes MDT Balanced C
Price$22.87
Change+$0.04 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets299.61M
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$38.75
Change+$0.04 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets265.62B
QCBGX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCBGX vs. RLBCX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCBGX is a Hold and RLBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 266B vs. QCBGX (300M). RLBCX pays higher dividends than QCBGX: RLBCX (1.49) vs QCBGX (0.61). QCBGX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: QCBGX (20 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). QCBGX (2.11) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). QCBGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). RLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCBGX: RLBCX (250) vs QCBGX (1500). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.34 vs. QCBGX (0.89). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 40.24 vs. QCBGX (17.19).
| QCBGX | RLBCX | QCBGX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.11 | 0.89 | 237% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.11 | 0.89 | 237% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.430 | 14.364 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 300M | 266B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 1.49 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.89 | 8.34 | 11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.14 | 49.26 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.19 | 40.24 | 43% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.21 | 72.18 | 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement