Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCBGX vs RLBCX
QCBGX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts QCBGX vs RLBCX
Federated Hermes MDT Balanced C
Price$23.18
Change+$0.05 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets303.13M
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$39.46
Change+$0.07 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets271.11B
QCBGX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCBGX vs. RLBCX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCBGX is a Buy and RLBCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 271B vs. QCBGX (303M). RLBCX pays higher dividends than QCBGX: RLBCX (1.44) vs QCBGX (0.60). QCBGX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: QCBGX (20 years) vs RLBCX (24 years). QCBGX (2.11) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). QCBGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). RLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCBGX: RLBCX (250) vs QCBGX (1500). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.93 vs. QCBGX (-1.04). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.26 vs. QCBGX (12.71).
| QCBGX | RLBCX | QCBGX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.11 | 0.89 | 237% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.11 | 0.89 | 237% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.685 | 16.253 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 303M | 271B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 1.44 | 42% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.04 | 8.93 | -12% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.03 | 39.00 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.71 | 37.26 | 34% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.15 | 71.11 | 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement