Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCBGX vs RLBCX
QCBGX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts QCBGX vs RLBCX
Federated Hermes MDT Balanced C
Price$22.94
Change-$0.26 (-1.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets305.35M
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$38.80
Change-$0.48 (-1.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets268.67B
QCBGX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCBGX vs. RLBCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCBGX is a Hold and RLBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 269B vs. QCBGX (305M). RLBCX pays higher dividends than QCBGX: RLBCX (1.46) vs QCBGX (0.60). QCBGX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: QCBGX (20 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). QCBGX (2.11) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). QCBGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). RLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCBGX: RLBCX (250) vs QCBGX (1500). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.58 vs. QCBGX (0.58). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 39.44 vs. QCBGX (15.95).
| QCBGX | RLBCX | QCBGX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.11 | 0.89 | 237% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.11 | 0.89 | 237% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.023 | 15.928 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 305M | 269B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 1.46 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.58 | 9.58 | 6% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.67 | 42.30 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.95 | 39.44 | 40% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.35 | 74.61 | 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement