Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCBGX vs RLBBX
QCBGX vs RLBBX Comparison
Open Charts QCBGX vs RLBBX
Federated Hermes MDT Balanced C
Price$22.19
Change+$0.09 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets279.8M
American Funds American Balanced R2
Price$36.57
Change+$0.18 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets252.39B
QCBGX vs RLBBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCBGX vs. RLBBX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCBGX is a Buy and RLBBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBBX has more cash in the bank: 252B vs. QCBGX (280M). RLBBX pays higher dividends than QCBGX: RLBBX (1.17) vs QCBGX (0.63). QCBGX was incepted earlier than RLBBX: QCBGX (20 years) vs RLBBX (23 years). QCBGX (2.12) is less costly to investors than RLBBX (1.32). QCBGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. RLBBX (44.00). RLBBX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCBGX: RLBBX (250) vs QCBGX (1500). RLBBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.05 vs. QCBGX (3.27). RLBBX return over 5 years is better than : 37.07 vs. QCBGX (20.52).
| QCBGX | RLBBX | QCBGX / RLBBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.12 | 1.32 | 161% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.12 | 1.32 | 161% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.146 | 7.674 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 280M | 252B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.63 | 1.17 | 54% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.27 | 7.05 | 46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.96 | 32.48 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.52 | 37.07 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.04 | 58.03 | 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers