Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCBGX vs RLBBX
QCBGX vs RLBBX Comparison
Open Charts QCBGX vs RLBBX
Federated Hermes MDT Balanced C
Price$22.47
Change+$0.07 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets283.15M
American Funds American Balanced R2
Price$36.87
Change+$0.07 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets254.37B
QCBGX vs RLBBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCBGX vs. RLBBX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCBGX is a Buy and RLBBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBBX has more cash in the bank: 254B vs. QCBGX (283M). RLBBX pays higher dividends than QCBGX: RLBBX (1.17) vs QCBGX (0.63). QCBGX was incepted earlier than RLBBX: QCBGX (20 years) vs RLBBX (23 years). QCBGX (2.12) is less costly to investors than RLBBX (1.32). QCBGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. RLBBX (44.00). RLBBX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCBGX: RLBBX (250) vs QCBGX (1500). RLBBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.41 vs. QCBGX (5.60). RLBBX return over 5 years is better than : 35.33 vs. QCBGX (19.42).
| QCBGX | RLBBX | QCBGX / RLBBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.12 | 1.32 | 161% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.12 | 1.32 | 161% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.498 | 8.557 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 283M | 254B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.63 | 1.17 | 54% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.60 | 9.41 | 59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.57 | 32.13 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.42 | 35.33 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.46 | 58.04 | 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement