Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCBGX vs RLBBX
QCBGX vs RLBBX Comparison
Open Charts QCBGX vs RLBBX
Federated Hermes MDT Balanced C
Price$22.52
Change-$0.02 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets285.66M
American Funds American Balanced R2
Price$37.10
Change-$0.09 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets256.26B
QCBGX vs RLBBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCBGX vs. RLBBX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCBGX is a Buy and RLBBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBBX has more cash in the bank: 256B vs. QCBGX (286M). RLBBX pays higher dividends than QCBGX: RLBBX (1.16) vs QCBGX (0.62). QCBGX was incepted earlier than RLBBX: QCBGX (20 years) vs RLBBX (23 years). QCBGX (2.12) is less costly to investors than RLBBX (1.32). QCBGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. RLBBX (44.00). RLBBX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCBGX: RLBBX (250) vs QCBGX (1500). RLBBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.14 vs. QCBGX (3.19). RLBBX return over 5 years is better than : 33.77 vs. QCBGX (16.45).
| QCBGX | RLBBX | QCBGX / RLBBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.12 | 1.32 | 161% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.12 | 1.32 | 161% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.740 | 9.234 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 286M | 256B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.62 | 1.16 | 53% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.19 | 7.14 | 45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.22 | 27.06 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.45 | 33.77 | 49% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.51 | 59.09 | 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement