Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCBGX vs RLBBX
QCBGX vs RLBBX Comparison
Open Charts QCBGX vs RLBBX
Federated Hermes MDT Balanced C
Price$22.91
Change+$0.10 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets294.33M
American Funds American Balanced R2
Price$38.19
Change+$0.11 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets262.04B
QCBGX vs RLBBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCBGX vs. RLBBX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCBGX is a Buy and RLBBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBBX has more cash in the bank: 262B vs. QCBGX (294M). RLBBX pays higher dividends than QCBGX: RLBBX (1.15) vs QCBGX (0.61). QCBGX was incepted earlier than RLBBX: QCBGX (20 years) vs RLBBX (23 years). QCBGX (2.12) is less costly to investors than RLBBX (1.32). QCBGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. RLBBX (44.00). RLBBX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCBGX: RLBBX (250) vs QCBGX (1500). RLBBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.30 vs. QCBGX (1.69). RLBBX return over 5 years is better than : 40.04 vs. QCBGX (21.57).
| QCBGX | RLBBX | QCBGX / RLBBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.12 | 1.32 | 161% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.12 | 1.32 | 161% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.623 | 12.553 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 294M | 262B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 1.15 | 54% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.69 | 7.30 | 23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.29 | 48.20 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.57 | 40.04 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.26 | 74.60 | 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement