Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCBGX vs RLBBX
QCBGX vs RLBBX Comparison
Open Charts QCBGX vs RLBBX
Federated Hermes MDT Balanced C
Price$23.20
Change+$0.01 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets308.56M
American Funds American Balanced R2
Price$39.19
Change+$0.08 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets268.19B
QCBGX vs RLBBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCBGX vs. RLBBX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCBGX is a Hold and RLBBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBBX has more cash in the bank: 268B vs. QCBGX (309M). RLBBX pays higher dividends than QCBGX: RLBBX (1.09) vs QCBGX (0.60). QCBGX was incepted earlier than RLBBX: QCBGX (20 years) vs RLBBX (24 years). QCBGX (2.11) is less costly to investors than RLBBX (1.32). QCBGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. RLBBX (44.00). RLBBX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCBGX: RLBBX (250) vs QCBGX (1500). RLBBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.11 vs. QCBGX (0.58). RLBBX return over 5 years is better than : 36.96 vs. QCBGX (15.95).
| QCBGX | RLBBX | QCBGX / RLBBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.11 | 1.32 | 160% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.11 | 1.32 | 160% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.023 | 15.500 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 309M | 268B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 1.09 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.58 | 9.11 | 6% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.67 | 40.59 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.95 | 36.96 | 43% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.35 | 70.07 | 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement