Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCBGX vs RLBAX
QCBGX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts QCBGX vs RLBAX
Federated Hermes MDT Balanced C
Price$23.18
Change+$0.05 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets303.13M
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$39.31
Change+$0.07 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets271.11B
QCBGX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCBGX vs. RLBAX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCBGX is a Buy and RLBAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 271B vs. QCBGX (303M). RLBAX pays higher dividends than QCBGX: RLBAX (1.07) vs QCBGX (0.60). QCBGX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: QCBGX (20 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). QCBGX (2.11) is less costly to investors than RLBAX (1.31). QCBGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. RLBAX (44.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCBGX: RLBAX (250) vs QCBGX (1500). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.44 vs. QCBGX (-1.04). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 34.78 vs. QCBGX (12.71).
| QCBGX | RLBAX | QCBGX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.11 | 1.31 | 161% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.11 | 1.31 | 161% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.685 | 15.776 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 303M | 271B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 1.07 | 56% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.04 | 8.44 | -12% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.03 | 37.26 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.71 | 34.78 | 37% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.15 | 66.67 | 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement