Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCACX vs VTSMX
QCACX vs VTSMX Comparison
Open Charts QCACX vs VTSMX
Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core C
Price$44.51
Change-$1.31 (-2.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.17B
Vanguard Total Stock Mkt Idx I
Price$165.41
Change+$4.46 (+2.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.06T
QCACX vs VTSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCACX vs. VTSMX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCACX is a Buy and VTSMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTSMX has more cash in the bank: 2.06T vs. QCACX (3.17B). VTSMX pays higher dividends than QCACX: VTSMX (1.00) vs QCACX (0.00). QCACX was incepted earlier than VTSMX: QCACX (20 years) vs VTSMX (34 years). QCACX (1.92) is less costly to investors than VTSMX (0.14). QCACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. VTSMX (2.00). QCACX has a lower initial minimum investment than VTSMX: QCACX (1500) vs VTSMX (3000). VTSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.79 vs. QCACX (8.09). VTSMX return over 5 years is better than : 68.19 vs. QCACX (29.65).
| QCACX | VTSMX | QCACX / VTSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 0.14 | 1,314% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 0.14 | 1,371% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.269 | 1.373 | -20% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 3000 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.17B | 2.06T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.09 | 14.79 | 55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.95 | 63.99 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.65 | 68.19 | 43% |
| Returns for 10 years | 151.76 | 270.18 | 56% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement