Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCACX vs VTSMX
QCACX vs VTSMX Comparison
Open Charts QCACX vs VTSMX
Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core C
Price$45.23
Change-$0.03 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.04B
Vanguard Total Stock Mkt Idx I
Price$165.31
Change-$0.09 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.06T
QCACX vs VTSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCACX vs. VTSMX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCACX is a StrongBuy and VTSMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTSMX has more cash in the bank: 2.06T vs. QCACX (3.04B). VTSMX pays higher dividends than QCACX: VTSMX (1.02) vs QCACX (0.00). QCACX was incepted earlier than VTSMX: QCACX (20 years) vs VTSMX (34 years). QCACX (1.92) is less costly to investors than VTSMX (0.14). QCACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. VTSMX (2.00). QCACX has a lower initial minimum investment than VTSMX: QCACX (1500) vs VTSMX (3000). VTSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.42 vs. QCACX (11.73). VTSMX return over 5 years is better than : 76.81 vs. QCACX (37.23).
| QCACX | VTSMX | QCACX / VTSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 0.14 | 1,314% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 0.14 | 1,371% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.651 | 17.377 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 3000 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.04B | 2.06T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.73 | 14.42 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.98 | 78.00 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.23 | 76.81 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | 127.08 | 234.96 | 54% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers