Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCACX vs VTSMX
QCACX vs VTSMX Comparison
Open Charts QCACX vs VTSMX
Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core C
Price$46.74
Change+$0.22 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.96B
Vanguard Total Stock Mkt Idx I
Price$163.76
Change+$0.68 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.05T
QCACX vs VTSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCACX vs. VTSMX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCACX is a StrongBuy and VTSMX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTSMX has more cash in the bank: 2.05T vs. QCACX (2.96B). VTSMX pays higher dividends than QCACX: VTSMX (1.02) vs QCACX (0.00). QCACX was incepted earlier than VTSMX: QCACX (20 years) vs VTSMX (34 years). QCACX (1.92) is less costly to investors than VTSMX (0.14). QCACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. VTSMX (2.00). QCACX has a lower initial minimum investment than VTSMX: QCACX (1500) vs VTSMX (3000). VTSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.43 vs. QCACX (3.39). VTSMX return over 5 years is better than : 77.17 vs. QCACX (40.61).
| QCACX | VTSMX | QCACX / VTSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 0.14 | 1,314% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 0.14 | 1,371% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.516 | 15.489 | 113% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 3000 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.96B | 2.05T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.39 | 11.43 | 30% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.15 | 64.40 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.61 | 77.17 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 129.88 | 223.01 | 58% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement