Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCACX vs VTSMX
QCACX vs VTSMX Comparison
Open Charts QCACX vs VTSMX
Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core C
Price$43.58
Change+$0.41 (+0.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.16B
Vanguard Total Stock Mkt Idx I
Price$149.99
Change+$1.28 (+0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.82T
QCACX vs VTSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCACX vs. VTSMX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCACX is a Buy and VTSMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTSMX has more cash in the bank: 1.82T vs. QCACX (2.16B). VTSMX pays higher dividends than QCACX: VTSMX (1.12) vs QCACX (0.00). QCACX was incepted earlier than VTSMX: QCACX (20 years) vs VTSMX (33 years). QCACX (1.94) is less costly to investors than VTSMX (0.14). QCACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. VTSMX (2.00). QCACX has a lower initial minimum investment than VTSMX: QCACX (1500) vs VTSMX (3000). VTSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.89 vs. QCACX (11.03). VTSMX return over 5 years is better than : 95.59 vs. QCACX (54.59).
| QCACX | VTSMX | QCACX / VTSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 0.14 | 1,314% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 0.14 | 1,386% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.469 | 6.421 | 163% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 3000 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.16B | 1.82T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.12 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.03 | 13.89 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.90 | 62.08 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.59 | 95.59 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 109.88 | 198.05 | 55% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement