Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCACX vs VTSMX
QCACX vs VTSMX Comparison
Open Charts QCACX vs VTSMX
Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core C
Price$44.54
Change+$0.25 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.32B
Vanguard Total Stock Mkt Idx I
Price$152.62
Change+$0.67 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.91T
QCACX vs VTSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCACX vs. VTSMX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCACX is a Buy and VTSMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTSMX has more cash in the bank: 1.91T vs. QCACX (2.32B). VTSMX pays higher dividends than QCACX: VTSMX (1.12) vs QCACX (0.00). QCACX was incepted earlier than VTSMX: QCACX (20 years) vs VTSMX (33 years). QCACX (1.94) is less costly to investors than VTSMX (0.14). QCACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. VTSMX (2.00). QCACX has a lower initial minimum investment than VTSMX: QCACX (1500) vs VTSMX (3000). VTSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.75 vs. QCACX (15.81). VTSMX return over 5 years is better than : 93.51 vs. QCACX (54.12).
| QCACX | VTSMX | QCACX / VTSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 0.14 | 1,314% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 0.14 | 1,386% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.902 | 8.287 | 156% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 3000 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.32B | 1.91T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.12 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.81 | 17.75 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.22 | 60.60 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.12 | 93.51 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 115.33 | 200.97 | 57% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement