Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCACX vs VSTSX
QCACX vs VSTSX Comparison
Open Charts QCACX vs VSTSX
Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core C
Price$45.03
Change-$0.01 (-0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.56B
Vanguard Total Stock Mkt Idx Instl Sel
Price$306.33
Change-$0.60 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.95T
QCACX vs VSTSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCACX vs. VSTSX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCACX is a Buy and VSTSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VSTSX has more cash in the bank: 1.95T vs. QCACX (2.56B). VSTSX pays higher dividends than QCACX: VSTSX (1.17) vs QCACX (0.00). QCACX was incepted earlier than VSTSX: QCACX (20 years) vs VSTSX (9 years). QCACX (1.94) is less costly to investors than VSTSX (0.01). QCACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. VSTSX (2.00). QCACX has a lower initial minimum investment than VSTSX: QCACX (1500) vs VSTSX (5000000000). VSTSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.06 vs. QCACX (14.14). VSTSX return over 5 years is better than : 85.09 vs. QCACX (49.11).
| QCACX | VSTSX | QCACX / VSTSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 0.01 | 18,400% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 0.01 | 19,400% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.144 | 10.361 | 137% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 5000000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.56B | 1.95T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.17 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.14 | 18.06 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.67 | 63.76 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.11 | 85.09 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 129.06 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement