Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCACX vs RWMFX
QCACX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts QCACX vs RWMFX
Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core C
Price$45.21
Change+$0.19 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.72B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.77
Change+$0.28 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets205.87B
QCACX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCACX vs. RWMFX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCACX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 206B vs. QCACX (2.72B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than QCACX: RWMFX (1.42) vs QCACX (0.00). QCACX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: QCACX (20 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). QCACX (1.92) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). QCACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCACX: RWMFX (250) vs QCACX (1500). QCACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.63 vs. RWMFX (4.12). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 50.29 vs. QCACX (46.50).
| QCACX | RWMFX | QCACX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 0.31 | 594% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 0.31 | 619% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.601 | 9.760 | 150% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.72B | 206B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.42 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.63 | 4.12 | 161% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.17 | 41.84 | 134% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.50 | 50.29 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 128.93 | 79.57 | 162% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers