Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCACX vs RWEBX
QCACX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts QCACX vs RWEBX
Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core C
Price$45.21
Change+$0.19 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.72B
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$66.32
Change+$0.27 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets205.87B
QCACX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCACX vs. RWEBX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCACX is a Hold and RWEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 206B vs. QCACX (2.72B). RWEBX pays higher dividends than QCACX: RWEBX (0.76) vs QCACX (0.00). QCACX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: QCACX (20 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). QCACX (1.92) is less costly to investors than RWEBX (1.06). QCACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. RWEBX (29.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCACX: RWEBX (250) vs QCACX (1500). QCACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.63 vs. RWEBX (3.29). QCACX (46.50) and RWEBX (45.88) have equivalent 5 years return.
| QCACX | RWEBX | QCACX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 1.06 | 174% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 1.06 | 181% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.601 | 9.079 | 161% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.72B | 206B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.76 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.63 | 3.29 | 202% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.17 | 38.78 | 145% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.50 | 45.88 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 128.93 | 73.45 | 176% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers