Advertisement
QBTS vs RCAT
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QBTS is a Buy and RCAT is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
QBTS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRCAT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- QBTS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- RCAT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
QBTS’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RCAT’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- QBTS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- RCAT’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
QBTS (@Computer Processing Hardware) experienced а +22.98% price change this week, while RCAT (@Aerospace & Defense) price change was -7.90% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Processing Hardware industry was +11.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +22.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +52.76%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Aerospace & Defense industry was +2.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +56.82%.
Reported Earning Dates
QBTS is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Computer Processing Hardware (+11.28% weekly)Computer Processing Hardware industry produces central processing unit, monitor, keyboard, computer data storage devices, and graphics card. Business activity and economic growth are potential drivers of this industry – if more businesses are growing or flourishing, so would their investments in computer equipment. Dell Technologies, Inc, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co., NCR Corporation are key producers of computer processing hardware.
@Aerospace & Defense (+2.76% weekly)Aerospace & Defense is one of largest industries in the U.S., mainly comprising the following areas: commercial airliners, military aircraft, missiles, space, and general aviation. Focused heavily on research & development, it is also one of the fastest growing industries. Military aircraft has the largest market share in the industry’s sales, followed by space systems, civil aircraft, and missiles. Aerospace exports, directly and indirectly, support more jobs than the export of any other commodity, according to a study by the U.S. Department of Commerce. Boeing Company, Lockheed Martin Corporation and General Electric Company are some of the most prominent players in this space.
| QBTS | RCAT | QBTS / RCAT | |
| Capitalization | 9.48B | 1.23B | 774% |
| EBITDA | -277.43M | -26.37M | 1,052% |
| Gain YTD | 230.000 | -19.222 | -1,197% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 22.3M | 16.5M | 135% |
| Total Cash | 819M | 65.9M | 1,243% |
| Total Debt | 40M | 21.9M | 183% |
RCAT | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 14 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 57 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 45 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 99 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 99 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 9 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| QBTS | RCAT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 21 days ago 89% | 10 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 88% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PSCE | 43.66 | 0.90 | +2.10% |
| Invesco S&P SmallCap Energy ETF | |||
| FLYD | 6.99 | 0.13 | +1.83% |
| MicroSectors™ Travel -3X Inv Lvgd ETNs | |||
| EMF | 16.51 | 0.02 | +0.13% |
| Templeton Emerging Markets Fund | |||
| VTEC | 99.65 | -0.20 | -0.20% |
| Vanguard California Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | |||
| SNSR | 39.11 | -0.52 | -1.31% |
| Global X Internet of Things ETF | |||
QBTS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QBTS has been closely correlated with QUBT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QBTS jumps, then QUBT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QBTS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QBTS | 100% | +0.73% | ||
| QUBT - QBTS | 70% Closely correlated | +0.02% | ||
| RGTI - QBTS | 70% Closely correlated | +0.57% | ||
| IONQ - QBTS | 57% Loosely correlated | -1.70% | ||
| QMCO - QBTS | 51% Loosely correlated | -4.96% | ||
| UMAC - QBTS | 37% Loosely correlated | -4.29% | ||
More | ||||
RCAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RCAT has been loosely correlated with ACHR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RCAT jumps, then ACHR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RCAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RCAT | 100% | -11.81% | ||
| ACHR - RCAT | 45% Loosely correlated | -2.90% | ||
| IONQ - RCAT | 39% Loosely correlated | -1.70% | ||
| LUNR - RCAT | 38% Loosely correlated | -3.57% | ||
| QBTS - RCAT | 36% Loosely correlated | +0.73% | ||
| ANET - RCAT | 36% Loosely correlated | -1.01% | ||
More | ||||